Teaching Tips

Site: ART Online
Course: Teaching Tips
Book: Teaching Tips
Printed by: Guest user
Date: Wednesday, 16 October 2024, 1:23 PM

Table of contents

1. Teaching bell handling

Combining strokes

Having got your novice ringer ringing the separate strokes proficiently, it is always a little nerve-racking handing over control of the bell so that they can put both strokes together. We share some helpful tips from Helen McGregor.

A balanced ringing style – which hand is doing most of the work?

Many learners don’t achieve a handstroke where the work is equally shared between the hands. What you often see, to a greater or lesser degree, is the right hand in charge of the sally, taking hold of it before the left, doing most of the pull and releasing it later than the left. Let’s look at the origin of the problem and then some ways to resolve it.

How long do I go on working on improving handling style

To help us as ringing teachers understand how long we should continue to work with learners we need to learn about the learning process. Learners will need a different approach to teaching when they are at the different stages of learning.

Teaching the rhythm of the lead

Helen McGregor explains an exercise which works very well at teaching the rhythm of the lead.

Do your learners struggle with changing the speed of their bell, particularly at backstroke?

By the time learners move onto Plain Hunt they need to be comfortable with speed changes so they can devote their attention to the bell’s path, not being overly distracted by the mechanics of getting the bell to ring in the desired place. This skill starts developing from the earliest handling exercise through to the end of Learning the Ropes Level 1 when the learner can raise, lower and set a bell. Many of the LtR Level 2 exercises contribute to the refinement of this skill and with a little imagination, you can find others too.

1.1. Combining strokes

Having got your novice ringer ringing the separate strokes proficiently, it is always a little nerve-racking handing over control of the bell so that they can put both strokes together.

Before you start, it is a good idea to adjust the length of the tail end so that the bell is rung under the balance, taking the pressure off the novice if they fumble or miss the sally and reducing your stress levels too!

A good place to start is for the novice to ring all the backstrokes with the handstrokes being introduced gradually – starting with just one. Which one depends on you and your novice ringer.

You can ask your ringer to ring the handstroke directly after the bell is pulled off, which is a natural place to start if your ringer has just mastered the handstroke pull off on its own, with you ringing the backstroke. In this case the novice ringer would begin by pulling off the first handstroke, transferring their hands onto the tail end and ringing the backstroke whilst you deal with all the following handstrokes.

Once the handstroke pull off and following backstroke is perfected ask the novice to catch ONE moving sally i.e. the novice pulls off at handstroke, rings the backstroke, catches one moving sally, the handstroke, rings the backstroke and you catch the next moving sally. Once perfected ask them to catch two consecutive moving sallies… but by now you may be already forgetting how many sallies you have told them to catch – is this next one yours or theirs? This is where regular patterns and verbal prompts become really useful.

You can ask your novice to ring every backstroke but only alternate sallies. Saying clearly after each handstroke – ‘yours’, ‘mine’, ‘yours’, ‘mine’- so everybody is clear about who is going to catch the sally next.

A pointed finger can also act as a visual prompt to reinforce whose sally it is next. Progress from this to the novice ringing two consecutive sallies and you ringing one. So after each handstroke, remind them aloud – this is your first sally, your second sally, this one is mine. Then the novice can move on to their ‘first of 3’, ‘second of 3’, third of 3’ and ‘mine’.

Alternatively, you can agree upfront a verbal prompt or instruction. For example:

  • That stroke number 1 is ALWAYS the teachers and that you will count the handstrokes loudly and backwards. 
  • When their hands are on the sally to pull the first handstroke identify that as stroke no 3.
  • The next handstroke is stroke number 2,
  • And the last sally belongs to you.
  • Then all you do is count – backwards – from a greater number and everyone knows whose sally is whose as you are always responsible for stroke number 1.

When you catch the sally, you can feedback to the ringer how powerful/underpowered it was when you caught it. You catching the occasional planned sally will give the ringer comfort/breathing space and will allow you to ‘get things back on track’ if there is any lack of control. The novice ringer will also be able to remind themselves of the feel of a good long straight down draw on the backstroke when they aren’t responsible for the sally and hopefully they will carry that on when they have to catch their own sally too.

Helen McGregor

1.2. A balanced ringing style – which hand is doing most of the work?

Many learners don’t achieve a handstroke pull where the work is equally shared between the hands. For the purposes of simplicity, I am going to assume the learner has the tail end in the left hand. What you often see, to a greater or lesser degree, is the right hand in charge of the sally, taking hold of it before the left, doing most of the pull and letting go later than the left. Let’s look at the origin of the problem and then some ways to resolve it.

One of the trickier parts of learning to handle a bell is getting the left hand to deal with both the tail end and the sally. The learner fears they will drop the tail end and so we get all manner of potential handling issues as they try to reduce this perceived risk.

One of these involves letting the right hand manage the sally, allowing the left time to deal with the tail end and then join it. The left hand then leaves the sally early, leaving the right to do the actual work.

Resolving the problem

Resolving the problem is something that’s ideally done during the process of learning to handle. However, we don’t live in that ideal world. We live in the real world with all its flaws. Please don’t come to my tower expecting to see nothing but perfect styles and hear nothing but perfect striking! I do my best, as do my ringers, but all are human with human imperfections and challenges.

So, what’s my take on this?

First, I will discuss with the learner (at whatever stage) why it is desirable that both hands/arms share the work. I make a bit of a joke about developing muscle only on one side, but we seriously consider the ringing action and that it is far better for the body to work as evenly as possible. In addition, the bell control at all stages (raising, ringing, lowering) will be more efficient. Depending on the individual, we may use a short video clip of their ringing to allow them to compare this to other people’s styles. It’s a fact that what someone feels they are doing may not be what they’re actually doing and video proof is what can convince them of this. I also find that before/after videos are really helpful. Sometimes they may like to keep copies for future reference – after all, whenever a ringer has a “weak point” in their handling it often crops up time and time again when they’re under stress, learning new things.

The next stage is a physical exercise. I ask them, with support, to ring the bell with just the left hand, keeping the other behind their back. Most require a good bit of support to have the confidence to even try this; I assure them my hand will be there as insurance. However, I am careful to add nothing at all to the pull. What normally happens is they struggle to pull off a bell they normal ring and are quite shocked. After a couple of slight fumbles with the sally due to them worrying about it, they quite quickly realise that they can ring the bell one handed as long as someone is there to make sure all is well.

I then ask them to ring the bell with the only the right hand working the sally. Again, I will put my hand on it to protect the stay if necessary. This time they usually find they can pull off with ease.

Essentially what we are doing is allowing the learner to discover for themselves how evenly they’re working. From this point the instruction is to focus intently on the left hand and be aware of its input. Then allow the right hand to stop pulling and just be there passively before gradually achieving a balance between the hands. The learner is encouraged to ring a few whole pulls on their own whenever possible, perhaps just a few prior to rounds starting or ringing the service bell on a Sunday as this offers private practice time. Then they’re asked, whenever ringing something that is straightforward for them, to repeat this exercise of focusing on the balance of work.

Don’t expect a quick permanent fix – it will take time and desire from the learner to correct the habit.

Remember, practice doesn’t make perfect, it makes permanent!

Heather Peachey

1.3. How long do I go on working on improving handling style

To help us as ringing teachers understand how long we should continue to work with learners we need to learn about the learning process.

Learners will need a different approach to teaching when they are at different stages of learning.

The different teaching techniques are all about coaching the learner. Because of this emphasis on coaching, the ringing teacher will be referred to as a ringing coach or coach.

As a learner becomes more skillful through practice, assisted by coaching support, three stages are passed through:

  1. Novice (Cognitive)
  2. Improver (Associative)
  3. Expert (Autonomous)
The Novice

During the cognitive or mental stage, the learner is attempting to understand the basic task and is figuring out the skill. They are learning to identify all the component parts of the skill and forming a mental picture of what is required.

Characteristics of the Novice
  • Relevant movements to perform the skill are being assembled
  • Major errors can be seen
  • The style is fitful and jerky
Coaching requirements of the Novice

Basic instruction of explanation, demonstration and small step exercises to help the learner get the feeling of the actions. These will all help the learner get a mental picture of what is required. This is the time to get the foundation skills accurate. Learners are not aware of what they are doing wrong or how to correct errors.

Good feedback during this phase is important. Correct performances are infrequent at this stage and should be reinforced through external feedback and positive reinforcement from the ringing coach. Words and gestures are both relevant – a quick thumbs up can convey a lot.

The learner needs praise at this stage. This is the time the learner is ringing on an individual bell.

The Improver

This is the phase where the basic skills are becoming refined and the learner is linking the component parts into a smooth action.

Characteristics of the Improver
  • Some errors are still evident
  • The style is a bit hit and miss [sometimes they get it right and sometimes they get it wrong]
  • The learner is starting to feel when they have got it right or wrong. They are starting to be able to correct their own errors
Coaching requirements of the Improver

This is the phase where continued feedback from the coach, coupled with frequent opportunities to practise, gradually shapes and polishes the performance of a learner. Practise on an individual bell is still important to enable feedback and reinforcement to be given. Practise of handling must be performed regularly and correctly.

Learners will be ringing on open bells and they need to ring on a variety of bells to help them develop their skills. The feedback they receive through the rope from the bell is an extremely good tutor.

The Expert

In this final stage of learning, errors are rare and performance has become consistent and fluid. The movements are well learned and stored in the long-term memory of the brain as a movement pattern. Bell handling has become automatic and involves little or no conscious effort.

Characteristics of the Expert
  • Few small errors can be seen
  • Fluid style
  • Can transfer most learning to novel situations [the learner can cope with different bells easily]
Coaching requirements of the Expert

At this point the brain now has spare conscious capacity and it can give this spare attention to focusing on learning new things such as Call Changes, Plain Hunt and method ringing.

It should be noted that not all performers reach this stage,, which may explain why older learners who can be less coordinated than younger ringers can find it harder to develop their method ringing. They still have to use a large part of the brain to consciously control the bell!

To retain the new skilled performance at this level it must be constantly practised to reinforce the movement pattern. At this time coaches can diversify practice conditions; this is the time to take your learner on a ringing outing.

Pip Penney

1.4. Teaching the rhythm of the lead

Here on Alderney I have just spent a delightful week with five ‘ringing improvers’. They were able to handle their bell but their handling needed some polishing before they could progress onto Call Changes and take their first steps towards Plain Hunt. Leading was a great obstacle for all of them, however the following exercise worked very well at teaching the rhythm of the lead.

Ringing six bells with the students on bells 2 to 6, an experienced ringer rang the treble and led throughout. The students perfected their “leading” by hunting the back five bells from 6ths place down to 2nds and back so that the turnaround “at the front” was actually in seconds place and was lying over the experienced helper in first place (permanently leading) rather than attempting to lead by following a bell in 6ths place on the opposite stroke. In this fashion they got to 'feel' the rhythm of the turnaround, having a real target to aim at for their lie in seconds place at the end of their quick strokes.

Once perfected we called the experienced ringer off the front up to the back to ring an unmusical six but left the students on the bells they were used to and rang 'standard' Plain Hunt on five bells, leading opposite to the tenor. The resulting improvement in their leading was miraculous and accompanied by masses of smiles and remarks such as “That felt so different to my usual attempts and sounded great!”

Helen McGregor

1.5. Do your learners struggle with changing the speed of their bell, particularly at backstroke?

By the time learners move onto plain hunting they need to be comfortable enough with speed changes so that they can devote their attention to the bell’s path, not being overly distracted by the mechanics of getting the bell to ring in the desired place. Some will inevitably find it harder than others. This skill starts developing from the earliest handling exercise through to the end of Learning the Ropes Level 1 when the learner can raise, lower and set a bell. Many of the LtR Level 2 exercises contribute to the refinement of this skill and with a little imagination you can find others too.

Observation of experienced ringers shows that they do not always change their hand position on the rope when changing speed. When ringing ligher bells they achieve a quicker backstroke by bending their arms a little. Only when ringing a heavier bell do they shift up and down the tail end. The same is true of the handstroke, but here there is likely to be a small change in the position of the hands on the sally.

So, what’s going on? Efficient control of a bell relies upon the ringer having both the skills and experience to deliver the optimum amount of work on the bell, using a personally comfortable amount of physical effort. Simple physics tells us that the work applied to the bell is the force applied multiplied by the distance over which that force is applied. Ringers make changes to both force and distance as required. The experienced ringer does not need to think about doing so any more than a driver has to consider how hard/fast to turn the steering wheel. The novice does need to devote thought to the process and needs to develop a feel for both force and distance. Many start off by applying great force over a small distance, which is tiring and inefficient. Others struggle to apply enough force.

We teach the skill of a long pull to maximise the work achieved by the force applied. This of course has the essential benefit of better rope control and reduces the temptation to “snatch” at the sally.

As the novice progresses on to the stage of needing to make fine adjustments in order to vary speed we must ensure they have the physical skills to control the speed change. These are the same skills as the start of ringing down and the end of ringing up. Ring a bell yourself or have someone else do it and show natural ways of achieving speed, perhaps start by ringing a bell part down and back up again. Have learners watch, discuss and then experiment on single bells, seeking to refine the basic skills they have developed to date. Encourage them to consider the effectiveness of both moving the hands up/down the tail end, altering the positioning of the hands on the sally and ringing with arms straight, moderately bent or very bent. You may find it useful to consciously ring different weight bells for a dodging exercise yourself and discover what you do on various bells.

Having said that, it is absolutely essential that novice ringers learn the skill of ringing with the maximum distance of pull possible and learn to make quick and efficient alterations to their tail end length at the correct point in the pull, i.e. before the rope starts to rise to the backstroke and not whilst their hands are up in the air. It may be that they find this easier on a middle to back bell than on a light one. Having developed this skill they will be able to deal with pulling off a bell which has a tail end that is much too long or with a bell that suddenly drops for whatever reason and they will be well set up to learn to efficiently control bigger bells. Later they will settle to their own comfortable style, using the range of pull-length that suits them and the bell they’re ringing – but they have to “walk before they can run”.

Once the learner can comfortably change speed at will on a single bell, they need to practise it at normal ringing rhythms. There are many exercises which can be used for this – here are just a few:

  • Follow the leader: offer a bell to follow who will take the learner on a journey of varying speeds.
  • “Hunting” through static bells, i.e. the rest of the ringers stay in rounds sequence and allow the novice to ring in 2nds, 3rds etc between them. Hunting up/down can be separated by instructing the novice to hunt to 5ths and stay there. Then on an agreed cue, starting at backstroke, they hunt down to lead. This is a good way of emphasising the three speeds of hunting without them thinking about finding bells to follow.
  • Call changes, changing at backstroke as well as at handstroke.
  • Dodgy call changes.
  • Long and short place making (Kaleidoscope) again changing at backstroke as well as hand.
  • Mexican Wave.

Heather Peachey

2. The foundation skills

Steps to ropesight

Acquiring that elusive skill known as ropesight can be a frustrating time. In her teaching tip, Heather Peachey believes you can’t specifically teach or learn ropesight. What you can do is provide the best opportunities for the skill to develop, whilst reassuring learners that they will develop it at their own pace.

Developing listening and striking skills

Listening is one of the foundation skills of ringing. Without the ability to hear their bell it is impossible for a ringer to reach their full potential. New ringers frequently have difficulty identifying the sound of their own bell. This article provides a few tips on how to help your ringers hear their bell and develop the good rhythmic ringing we all want to hear.

Teaching Call Changes

Most ringers are taught Call Changes after learning to ring rounds. Call Changes may be thought of as simple but there is more to them than might be imagined. Which skills does your ringer need to have or develop before learning to ring Call Changes?

Teaching Call Changes – putting it all into action

Putting into action the skills discussed in the previous article. How to make the first moves a success, how to use feedback to improve accuracy and how to move onto more complicated changes.

Teaching Kaleidoscope Ringing

Kaleidoscope ringing is a series of exercises made within two places. The simplest form is long places, four blows in one place. This is followed by place making with two blows being rung in each place and then by dodging. Kaleidoscope ringing helps a new ringer hear their bell and identify which place they are ringing in.

Advanced Kaleidoscope Ringing

Moving on from basic kaleidoscope works, there may be times when more advanced sequences may be useful to your band. When might this be?

A dedicated foundation skills practice

Pam Ebsworth had a number of teachers who had recently attended an ART Module 2 day course. Pam was wondering how to give these teachers more teaching practice. The problem was that these particular teachers were not Tower Captains and were finding few opportunities to teach at the necessary level. After discussion with other ART mentors it was decided to hold a dedicated Learning the Ropes Level 2 practice.

2.1. Steps to ropesight

Acquiring that elusive skill known as “ropesight” can be a frustrating time. I believe you can’t specifically teach or learn “ropesight”. What you can do is provide the best opportunities for the skill to develop, and reassure learners that they will develop it at their own pace. The teacher needs to watch out for sticking points and try to find interesting, creative exercises that suit the occasion to avoid learners becoming dispirited.

The process should begin as early as Learning the Ropes Level 1. Yes, the primary focus is on actually learning to control a bell, but at the same time the learner should be encouraged to watch other people ringing and guided in how to do so. The need to look at the hands and faces of the other ringers is not as obvious as experienced ringers may think. I discovered relatively recently the reason one of my ringers has an ingrained habit of looking up. As a conscientious learner she spent many hours, while sitting out, trying to watch what was going on and acquired a habit of looking up and watching the sallies descend. Despite frequent reminders and knowing it’s unhelpful, she still feels pulled to default to this when “lost” and felt quite uneasy when visiting a tower with a low ceiling because the sallies disappeared from view.

Guided exercises in watching

These are best done from a standing position to discourage looking upwards.

  • Watch a skilled ringer by scanning between hands and face. Notice when in the stroke the bell sounds. Notice the point the hands are momentarily stationary; it’s after the hands rise with the tail end or sally, just before the ringer consciously draws the rope down (pulls). This is a good point of reference.
  • Watch rounds on four bells. Explain that the 2 and 3 will now be asked to change places a few times. As they change, watch the hands of each ringer and try to see the order in which they are ringing.
  • Watch the 4 cover over 2 and 3 making long places, short places and dodging (Learning the Ropes Level 2 exercises). Stand with the learner and have them state which bell the 4 is ringing over. This also prepares the learner for their own experience of these exercises so ensure the correct terminology is used.
  • As soon as the learner can manage backstrokes on their own, have a bell ring just in front of them and one behind (i.e. rounds on three bells). This is a ropesight development exercise, not a speed control one, so the other two bells must allow the learner to dictate the pace. Have the learner actively look and listen, developing an awareness of seeing and hearing the timing. Repeat with handstrokes and later with both strokes. Remember, these exercises complement the single bell work, not replace it and the learner at this stage is not responsible for keeping perfect timing! The purpose is to introduce ropesight, the rhythm of rounds, hearing your bell in amongst others, responses to “treble’s going” and “stand”, and to add in variety to the experience of learning bell control at points when adult learners often feel they’re struggling to make progress.
Kaleidoscope Exercises and Call Changes

As soon as a learner can ring rounds reasonably well, start to introduce a range of Kaleidoscope exercises and Call Changes (Learning the Ropes Level 2). Aim to develop the ability to follow different bells as well as listen to the sound that’s produced. Encourage visual scanning of all the other bells that are ringing. Point out that as soon as you’ve committed to a backstroke or handstroke you cannot alter that stroke – so immediately start scanning for the next bell to follow rather than watching the bell you’re already following for too long. Additionally the learner should gain an understanding of place in the row and learn to lead with a good rhythm.

Covering by ropesight

Using a band of five stable ringers plus the learner, place the learner on the 4, 5 or the tenor, depending on their physical ability and weight/go of the bells. The reason for having six bells ringing is to provide a six-bell rhythm. Ask the learner to attempt exercises such as:

  • Covering over the two bells immediately before them. These two bells will have been asked to swap increasingly randomly (good exercise in planning and communication for these two ringers).
  • Covering over three bells who are plain hunting or whatever you wish.
  • Covering to Plain Hunt on 4 and 5 bells. If the learner can’t physically manage a back bell, then have them ring the treble and call the bells into a suitable change such as 234156. 234 can then plain hunt.
  • Cover to Plain Bob Minimus.
  • Cover to Cloister Doubles (Stedman Quick Sixes, where the double dodges in 4-5 are done by only 3 of the working bells, while the other two are repeatedly making thirds from the front).
  • Cover to Stedman Doubles (as above, but any pair of bells can be at the back).
  • Cover to Plain Bob/Grandsire Doubles.

Encourage both listening and looking to see who they’re following; learners will vary in which they find easier.

Explain that “seeing” is a ropesight skill which complements listening. Point out that you cannot wholly accurately place the bell merely by looking, but it’s the looking that gives you the approximate position and the listening that allows you to fine tune it.

Why look? Why not just listen?

Around this stage, if not before, some will notice that many experienced ringers appear not to look at all, instead seeming to find inspiration from the pattern on the carpet. Use this to prompt a discussion and exercises on the use of peripheral vision and an awareness of the other bells. It can be very useful to do some whole band exercises on this, by asking the entire company to look at a point in space and rely only on peripheral vision to strike rounds. It is not unusual to have better rounds than expected!

It’s worth pointing out that when you’re inexperienced or unfamiliar with what you’re ringing, using direct gaze along with peripheral vision can be helpful for two reasons.

  • Other ringers will often give help via facial expressions and gestures.
  • Teachers and conductors can tell from a ringer’s direction of gaze whether that person is “lost” or is trying to do the right thing but in the wrong part of a row. For example, a conductor might say “Sam, you’re dodging 3-4”; the trouble is Sam knows this, however the bell is actually around 4-5. Sam has not been helped at all by the comment – the information necessary was that the dodge was with the 2, not with the 5. Personally, when a learner needs only little assistance in change ringing, I like to stand out in a position where I can see their face. I can then see whether or not an error is one of knowing the place they are in, but failing to find it, or whether they’ve dropped off their “line”.

Heather Peachey

2.2. Developing listening and striking skills

Listening is one of the foundation skills for ringing. Without the ability to hear their bell it is impossible for a ringer to reach their full potential. New ringers frequently find difficulty identifying the sound of their own bell. This article provides a few tips on how to help your ringers hear their bell and develop the good rhythmic ringing we all want to hear.

From the very first lesson

We teach on tied bells so as not to annoy the neighbours with the sound of a random bell or bells ringing. However, we do need to start to make the ringer aware of the importance of listening to and hearing their bell right from the very beginning.

If you have a simulator in your tower and you are teaching a single learner you can provide the simulated sound of that bell ringing during the teaching process. If you are teaching several learners in the tower together this is not possible unless you have multiple computers and use headphones.

So how can we overcome this difficulty?

  • Using a laptop with suitable software for the ringer to make the bell sound by pressing a particular key on the keyboard is a good starting point. Headphones can be used and the new ringers can take their turn at listening and striking exercises on the laptop when they are taking a rest from the immediate handling lessons. It is usually easiest for the ringer to hear the tenor to start with. After a session, use the “Review Striking” facility to emphasise the importance of accuracy and to allow the ringer to notice improvement in future sessions.
  • While your new ringer is still learning to handle a bell they can attend a practice and ring individual strokes (back or hand) with the band so that they start to be aware of the sound of rounds. In both of these examples encourage them to identify the place in the row their bell is sounding and to start to count that place. If the ringer is struggling to identify the bell they are ringing, try using a familiar phrase to help identify the place. A commonly used one is “we all like fish and chips , I want some for my tea” .In this example the ringer is ringing bell number four in rounds and emphasising the fourth sound in the row with the words fish and for.
Now the ringer can ring an individual bell unaided

Once your new ringer can ring an individual bell without assistance they can start ringing with others. As the teacher you need to be certain that your ringer is identifying the sound of their own bell. One way of doing this is to start the ringer ringing rounds on three bells - start with them on the third and then let them ring the second. You can use the rhyme “Three – Blind – Mice” if they are struggling. The familiarity of the rhyme aids in the identification of the sound of their bell.

Many ringers can perform rounds on three accurately right from the start and can be moved on to rounds on four and then six on the first practice night. However, there are others who may take a few weeks to hear the sound and take ownership of what they are hearing.

At this stage ringing on a tied bell with a simulator is invaluable. If you don’t have a simulator in your tower a neighbouring tower may let you take your ringers to them for a few sessions on their simulator.

Listening and striking exercises with a group

Ideally, these exercises would not be practised on open bells but with a simulator.

  • Setting alternate bells at backstroke and then getting your ringers to pull off and ring rounds is a challenging exercise for beginners and sometimes for experienced ringers as well. It provides variety and is fun to do.
  • Facing outwards from the circle one ringer at a time so that the ringer is unable to see the bell they are following is useful. Ensure your ringers make the turn when the rope is up at backstroke, this will ensure there is no likelihood of getting tangled with a moving rope.
  • Whole pull and stand for a whole pull, keep the tenor ringing for the whole pull while the other bells are standing. Then practice the perfect pull off each time.

An ability to control and hear the bell are both necessary to produce good rhythmic ringing. For rhythmic change ringing a knowledge of theory and ropesight needs to be added into the equation.

  • Plain Hunting can be used as an exercise to develop rhythmic ringing; this is equivalent to practising scales on a musical instrument and should be repeated frequently when working towards good striking on a certain number of bells. For instance when a ringer is moving from Doubles to Minor, Minor to Triples or Major.
  • Treble Bob Hunt with all the bells following the same line can be used when moving ringers on to Treble Bob or Surprise methods. It is false. The coursing order is Plain Hunt coursing order so there are no ropesight issues and ringers can concentrate on striking and rhythm.
  • Kaleidoscope ringing can be used to help develop good striking. Long places [two whole pulls], places [a whole pull] and dodging can be combined to make different exercises. Work is done within two places and the ringing frequently returns to rounds in which it is easier for the less experienced ringer to identify their own bell. The changes can also be started on a backstroke.
Resource tips

The following YouTube resource describes ropesight using a dynamic diagram of Plain Hunt on five bells. At 1:25 in the video there is a slo-mo video recording of Plain Hunt highlighting ropesight from the treble.

Keeping track of where you are in the change. This article explains how ringers keep track of their place in a change through counting places, listening, ropesight and dividing the changes into hand and back. Originally published in The Ringing World.

Pip Penney

2.3. Teaching Call Changes

Call Changes is the skill that most new ringers are taught after learning to ring rounds. It may be thought of as simple but there is more to it than might originally be imagined.

What skills does my ringer need to have or develop before learning to ring call changes?
  • To be able to ring rounds
  • To be able to stay in the correct place
  • To be aware of where their bell is striking in the row
  • To be able to hear when the bell is out of place and be able to adjust to get back into the rounds
  • Ability to ring quicker or slower [ability to hold up and check in]

Absolute perfection cannot be expected at this stage.

What theory does my ringer need to know before learning to ring call changes?
  • Treble/Tenor
  • Front/back
  • Lead/lie/cover
  • Up/down – in/out
  • Concept of a row
  • Concept of place in the row
  • Concept of a whole pull
  • Meaning of check/pull-hold up/check in
  • Understanding of why change of speed is required to change place in the row
What teaching aids could I use to help my ringer understand?

The Call Change Toolbox has a ready-made PowerPoint presentation for you to use with your ringers to introduce these basic concepts in an interesting way. You will find also find Call Change worksheets for your ringers to use.

A white board is a quick and easy way to illustrate the way in which call changes work. A few rows written out and joined together with arrows can illustrate these concepts in a few moments. By joining the bells with lines you are in fact introducing your ringer to the visual representation of the “blue line” without having to even mention it by name.

What new information do I need to give my ringer before introducing Call Changes?

Before you undertake the teaching of Call Changes with your ringers you need to decide which method of calling you are going to use. The three different calls below all lead to the same change:

Calling up 1 2 3 4 5 6 “3 to 4” 1 2 4 3 5 6
Calling down 1 2 3 4 5 6 “4 to 2” 1 2 4 3 5 6
Calling by place in the rows 1 2 3 4 5 6 “3rds place bell follow 4ths place bell” 1 2 4 3 5 6

Teaching Tip

Whichever method you choose to use it is important that your ringer learns to identify what place in the row their bell is sounding at after every change. As an exercise ask your ringers to say their place number as they strike their bell. This will help reinforce the concept of which place they are ringing in.

Pip Penney

2.4. Teaching Call Changes – putting it all into action

Placing your band

Ensure you have a treble ringer who is leading well and a tenor ringer with a good sense of rhythm. Place competent ringers on either side of the inexperienced ringer.

For the very first Call Change it is easier for your ringer to work with the bells he is already looking towards and following in rounds, that is to say to get the ringer to move down a place out of rounds and up a place to get back into rounds. If you choose this option it means that the ringer cannot ring the 2, as, at this point in their ringing development they are unlikely to have learnt how to lead.

The first call – what does your ringer need to know?
  • The call is made on the handstroke pull
  • They will ring that handstroke followed by the backstroke
  • The change of speed to get into the new place is made on the following handstroke
  • The change of speed is for one blow only and then normal rounds speed is resumed

Explain to your ringer that this whole pull warning gives them the opportunity to adjust the intervening backstroke to enable the bell to be moved into the new place more easily, putting less energy in when preparing to move down a place. When ringing the handstroke more quickly, putting in more energy is necessary to make the bell swing higher in preparation for holding up the following handstroke when moving up a place.

The ringer needs to understand what happens at a call, which bells are affected, and in what way. So, if the call is 3 to 4:

  • The 3 has to hold up, ringing more slowly to follow the 4 in 4th place
  • The 4 has to check in, ringing more quickly to follow the 2 in 3rd place
  • The 5 stays in 5th place but now follows the 3 not the 4

The use of questions to check understanding ensures the ringer has processed the information. For example: “when your bell is called to move down [or up] does it have to ring more quickly or more slowly?” This may seem obvious to the teacher but when first asked, this question may confuse new ringers.

Using questions to check understanding

When the ringing is settled ask:

  • What place is your bell sounding in?
  • Which bell are you following?
  • Which bell is that following?
  • Who is following you?

And when they have advanced a little:

  • Which bell is leading?
  • Which bell is behind?

And even:

  • What is the order of the bells?

Following the call

Gaining accuracy pyramid

Observe how accurately the call was executed.

Feedback to the ringer:

  • Feedback is used to reinforce what is wanted – so tell them if their striking the change was accurate and if the following back stroke was accurate.
  • Feedback is used to change and improve things – so tell them where they were struggling and it was not sounding right

Give the ringer the information to improve performance at the next attempt – for example – “next time put a little less weight on your backstroke so that it is easier to get the following handstroke down into the new place”.

Give the ringer opportunity to repeat the action.

Give feedback again – improved? Still having problems? Repeat these two simple changes until the accuracy of the striking improves.

This whole process can then be repeated again by calling the ringer to move up a place, i.e. looking to his or her left to move up and to the right to move down again into rounds.

Moving on beyond the basic moves

When a ringer can accurately move up and down a place and return to steady rounds, they are ready to move on to more complicated sequences. The ringer can be introduced to common sequences such as:

Queens: 1 3 5 2 4 6
Tittums: 1 4 2 5 3 6
Whittingtons: 1 5 3 2 4 6

Whilst ringing more complicated sequences the teacher should use questions such as “what place in the row is your bell sounding?” This process continues until the teacher is certain that the ringer is always aware of their place in the row. Another ringer could be used to stand behind and ask these questions.

Reinforcing the sense of place

To help reinforce the sense of place in the row a ringer can be asked to call simple Call Changes, for example to call themselves up and then back down a place or two places.

A ringer who finds this exercise easy can move on to calling more complex sequences such as the bells into Queens or Tittums and back into rounds.The use of exercises such as these can give the teacher an indication of the ringers who already have a good idea of where each bell is at each call.

The ringers can be asked to say the number of the place they are ringing in. Starting with the bell leading the ringer says “lead or first”, the bell in seconds place then says “second”, this progresses around the circle until all the ringers have said the number of the place they are ringing in.

Using variations to reinforce and to improve skills

Once the ringer is confidently ringing Call Changes and is:

  • Striking accurately
  • Aware of their place in the row
  • Understands the calls and is not making mistakes

Variations can be added this will develop skills and provide interest:

  • Call by place in the row
  • Call and change at backstroke
  • Call by ringers' names
  • Ring dodgy Call Changes – a call proceeded by a dodge! This variation demands an increased level of bell control to strike accurately and is a good exercise to use to work on accurate striking
  • Call from rounds directly into a known sequence such as Queens. This requires an increased level of bell control but once the striking is good can be used for ringing at weddings and other occasions

Direct your ringers to the Call Change Toolbox for ringers where they can learn more of the theory and practice of Call Changes.

Pip Penney

2.5. Teaching Kaleidoscope Ringing

Kaleidoscope ringing is a series of exercises made within two places. It can be started at handstroke or backstroke.

The simplest form is “long places”, 4 blows in one place. This is followed by “place making” with two blows being rung in each place and then by “dodging”. Each one demands a higher level of bell control than the previous one. They are best introduced in this order.

Simple kaleidoscope exercises

The aim of the exercises are:

  • To refine bell control
  • To refine listening skills
  • To develop accurate striking and good rhythm
  • To reinforce the concept of place

If new ringers are to move forward with change ringing they need to be able to hear their own bell and identify which place they are ringing in. Conventional call changes, called by asking two numbered bells to swap places, do not develop these skills.

Why Kaleidoscope Ringing?

In kaleidoscope ringing, the bells move into and out of rounds. As the sound of rounds is familiar to the ringer, any inaccuracies in the striking can be more easily identified. If the ringer is able to identify the sound of the bell in simple changes, he or she will be able to hear their bell in more complex sequences as their ringing progresses. In addition:

  • Instructions are easy to follow
  • Easy place identification for the ringer
  • Changes can be started at back or handstroke
  • Practise leading for only one whole pull at a time
  • Simple introduction to following a line
  • Changes of place can be memorised
  • Innovation and variety to maintain and develop foundation skills
  • Provides a basis for moving onto hunting on 3 bells
The basic works
  1. The conductor calls the bells to start on a handstroke or a backstroke
  2. The exercises continue until the conductor calls the bells involved to stop
  3. It is advised to start from rounds to begin with, with only one pair of bells working at a time
  4. When the striking is good, exercises can be undertaken with two or more pairs of bells involved
  5. When these basic manoeuvres have been mastered they can be combined to form a more advanced exercise. Different exercises can be rung at the same time in different pairs of places, not necessarily starting from rounds

Starting at backstroke is good preparation for moving the bell at backstroke when starting to learn Plain Hunt. It can also give practise at backwards leading.

Why not try this with your ringers?

In big change, little change all pairs swop for a whole pull, before returning to rounds for two blows. Then just the inside bells [2,3,4,5] swop places for a whole pull before returning to rounds. More bells are involved with the changes; the ringers have to concentrate hard to know when to move up or down a place. Ringers should be encouraged to think of the place they are ringing in, for example the 4 would be thinking 4th, 4th, 3rd ,3rd, 4th ,4th, 5th 5th, 4th 4th etc. This can be rung for service.

Resource Tips

Pip Penney

2.6. Advanced Kaleidoscope Ringing

Last time we looked at teaching the basics kaleidoscope works. But there may be times when more advanced sequences may be useful to your band. When might more advanced kaleidoscope ringing be useful for developing skills in my ringers?

Using Kaleidoscope ringing

There may be times when the band meets short, or at least is short at the beginning of practice before everyone arrives. Advanced kaleidoscope sequences may be used to practise the skills for ringing certain sections of methods that will be rung later.

There may be a time when you wish to emphasise the need for accurate striking to your ringers. These sequences provide a form of ringing where the ringer finds it easier to hear their bell as the bells frequently return to the familiar sound of rounds.

You may run a band where there is insufficient experience for your ringers to move on to method ringing. Kaleidoscope ringing provides more variety for your ringers and can be used to ring for services and other ringing performances.

It is possible for a ringer to learn for example: Stedman back work within two places (left), Stedman whole turns (second), Yorkshire Places (third). Cambridge front work (right) could also be learned in this way with one bell ringing the line and the other bell having the more difficult task of fitting in around it.

Four different advanced kaleidoscope sequences

These exercises familiarise ringers which pieces of ringing which they will meet later on when they move on to ringing methods.

Kaleidoscope ringing on higher numbers

Towers with higher numbers of bells sometimes find themselves in a position where they do not have sufficient advanced ringers to ring methods on the all the bells. Kaleidoscope ringing can provide a useful addition to ringing call changes providing more variety and consequently helping to maintain interest. It can be used with different skills levels, the more advanced ringers ringing sequences which are part of methods or which include dodging. Less able ringers could be put to ring Long Places with four blows in each place.

Why not customise your own Kaleidoscope sequence?

So start with the sequence might have a “separator”. So for example a sequence can be rung in 1 /2 with the 3 staying in thirds place and the 4 and 5 ringing a different sequence.This has the advantage of stabilising the ringing by keeping the 3 and the 6 in their home places and gives both the ringers of those bells an opportunity to learn to cover. As the ringers skills progress, the sequences can made more complex. For example, the teacher might start with the bells in 2/3 making long places, 4 staying in 4ths place and the bells in 5/6 making short places and move on to bells 1/2 treble bob hunting or ringing Cambridge front work with the bells in 3/4 making places and the bells in 5/6 staying still.

If your band has insufficient capable ringers to ring methods or you wish to build skills in certain ringers you can make up your own sequence to suit your band. Give it a name and ring it for service. Why not name it after your tower or one of your ringers! St Peters Places or Sheila’s Shuffle for example!

The possibilities are endless! Set your imagination free!

Direct your ringers to the Foundation Skills Toolbox where they can learn more about Kaleidoscope Exercises.

Pip Penney

2.7. A dedicated foundation skills practice

At Rattlesden, Suffolk, ART Assessor Pam Ebsworth had a number of teachers who hadrecently attended an ART Module 2 Day Course Teaching Elementary Change Ringing. Pam was wondering how to give her teachers more teaching practice. The problem was that these particular teachers were not Tower Captains and were finding difficulty getting opportunities to teach at the necessary level. After discussion with other mentors it was decided to hold a dedicated Learning the Ropes Level 2 practice. In line with the Level 2 syllabus, this practice would concentrate on Foundation Skills and ringing with others. A date was fixed and the day attended by three mentors, five teachers and various new ringers.

The topics to be covered were:
  • Controlling the bell
  • Listening to the strike of the bell
  • Following different bells when changing places
  • Understanding the concept of place in the row
  • Calling the bells to stand
  • Understanding the concept of place in the row
  • Starting to give simple instructions
Each teacher was to teach the new ringers one of these topics following discussion with the mentors. Obviously there are many different ways these various things can be introduced but these are the methods used by the Suffolk teachers.
 
Controlling the bell

Teacher number one used ‘whole pull and hold on the balance’. She taught when to pull off visually and how to listen for the strike of the bell. This is an excellent introduction to leading skills. The new ringers picked it up very quickly!

Listening to the strike of the bell

‘Ringing blind’ in rounds was used to help with listening skills. After learning to turn around while ringing, each ringer did this in rounds until the whole band was ringing ‘blind’. The task was taken to a more challenging level when Call Changes were added!

Following different bells when changing places

Teacher number three explained the theory of Call Changes, how adjacent bells change places and explained that bells can be called by the ‘up’ or ‘down’ method. He used numbered door knobs to explain this theory. Practice was then given using individual Call Change activities using the least preferred calling method! It’s good to be put out of your comfort zone.

Developing a sense of place in the row

The fourth teacher explained the concept of calling changes by calling by place in the row rather than by the number of the bell. Interestingly enough this proved quite straightforward for the new ringers and they took to it more easily than some established ringers do. It is important for ringers to start to be aware of their place in the row from early in their ringing career as without this awareness moving on successfully to method ringing will be more difficult.

The teacher also taught the ringers how to move out of the way and back again while the treble moved up to 5ths place and back down again. Apart from learning the speed changes without worrying about which bell to follow, this is very useful for teaching ‘place’ as the treble follows the 2 in 2nds place, the 3 in 3rds place etc. It also challenges the ropesight of the other ringers!Another teacher had the ringers walking Plain Hunt on three bells down the church aisle. The person/bell moving down stepped in front of the person/bell moving up. This covered what most of us would consider to be fairly advanced theory but yet again the new ringers soon grasped the idea.

Starting to give simple instructions

The fifth teacher explained to the new ringers that ringing instructions are generally made when the treble handstroke is just starting. The action then takes place at the following handstroke. He explained that the call needs to be loud enough for everyone to hear. The new ringers practised calling ‘stand’ from rounds and achieved this very quickly.

The outcome

The practice turned out to be a very interesting and challenging session. It certainly made all the teachers and mentors change their ideas about how much information relatively new ringers can absorb when concepts and activities are presented in an interesting and different way. Although the practice session was primarily designed for the teachers to hone their teaching skills, a lot of learning took place by the new ringers even though the bells were actually rung for less than half of the time.

Pip Penney

3. Teaching method ringing

How to teach a method

Before moving on to learning any method it is important that ringers have both the necessary foundation skills in place, and understand the theory of the method they are to ring. Learn what these are and how to teach them.

Teaching ringers to cover

Building the skills required to cover confidently and well with the goal of ringing a quarter peal on the tenor to a doubles method.

Teaching ringers to plain hunt

All the things that need to be covered in order to get your ringers confidently ringing Plain Hunt – theory, bell control, ropesight and place counting.

Introducing Plain Bob Doubles in easy stages

When learning Plain Bob Doubles as their first method, a ringer often finds that being able to recall the four leads of the plain course whilst ringing is too much. By using short learning methods to introduce the various different pieces of work in Plain Bob Doubles, the ringer does not have to be able to recall the whole forty changes of the plain course initially.

Introducing the bobs in Plain Bob Doubles

Splitting new skills into smaller bits allows the learner to tackle a new skill in bite-sizes chuncks. Here are two strategies to help your student learn the effect of a bot, both involving repeating selected works.

3.1. How to teach a method

Skills

Before moving on to learning a method (in this case, Plain Bob Doubles) it is important that ringers have the necessary foundation skills in place.

Ringers can gain valuable ropesight by having already learned to cover, or ringing the treble to touches of plain methods. Ringers who have completed Level 3 of the Learning the Ropes scheme will have already rung two quarter peals, one on the treble and one on the tenor.

A good sense of rhythm on five bells is also helpful. This skill can be developed by plain hunting starting on lots of different bells, as this helps the new ringer become familiar with spotting after bells on either side of them. So when ringing the third, the after bell is the second on the ringer’s right (in a clockwise tower). Whilst if they’ve started on the second, their after bell will be the fourth on their left.

Any experience your ringer can gain with dodging is valuable. If ringers can gain confidence with both dodging over and under at hand and back, they’ll already be familiar with the action of dodging when it occurs in a method.

Before ringing any method, ringers need to be able to successfully count their place. If this is still a struggle, you can help by standing with them as they hunt the treble and counting their place out loud for them. Once they are hunting reliably, they can count alongside you, and finally just count by themselves.

Theory

Ringers sometimes feel daunted by all the theory they need to learn when they first start ringing methods. It’s helpful if they can get into the habit of learning things away from the tower. However, some ringers can be quite resistant to this idea to begin with and teachers may have to try various strategies to persuade them.

So what’s new to learn?

  • The concept of the blue line and how the method works
  • The order (or circle) of work
  • The concept of start or place bells
  • Rules for passing the treble
  • The concept of the grid can be introduced for very keen people

The first time a method is learned, it is worth holding a dedicated theory session for the ringers, perhaps before practice. Or teachers may wish to hold a separate session and invite other local ringers, or run something for the local ringing society.

The Method Toolboxes are available on this site. They include:

  • PowerPoints covering the theory of Plain Bob Doubles.
  • Wall charts of a plain course and touches.
  • Games and quizzes which can be printed off and given to a ringer to complete before the next practice.
Smart phone apps

The Simulator Toolbox contains links to apps that allow ringers to practise methods on their Android device or smart-phone. Ringers can turn on bobs to learn touches, or just tap through a plain course. The app tells the ringer when they are correct and is easy to use!

Pip Penney

3.2. Teaching ringers to cover

Covering develops a ringer’s ropesight, the ability to see bells changing below them, and gives them a feeling of the rhythm of the change.

Skills

To cover confidently cover well your ringer needs to develop four skills:

  • Listening – the ability to hear their bell amongst others
  • A sense of rhythm – getting the feeling
  • Awareness of their place in the row – place counting
  • Ropesight – the ability to identify which bells to follow
Preparation

Your ringer is ready to learn to cover when they can:

  • Ring rounds
  • Hear what place their bell is sounding in
  • Recognise when their bell is out of place in rounds
  • Adjust their bell to get it back into rounds
  • Ring the tenor

Ringing the tenor in rounds will help the ringer get their ear tuned in to listening to themselves in 6th place. Always make sure the ringer is counting their place in rounds. Using a simulator to allow a ringer to ring rounds in 6th place is a useful exercise. The latest software with moving ringers which can be shown on a screen or large TV are particularly useful at this stage.

There is little theory required when teaching covering. However, remember to point out that when covering to Plain Hunt or methods, the bells change below on a backstroke for odd bell numbers and handstroke for even bell numbers.

Putting it into action

Teach your ringers to cover in graded steps making each step easier to achieve:

  • Call Changes
  • Place making, dodging, Kaleidoscope sequences
  • Plain Hunt on 3, 4 and then bells
  • On 8 bells steady ringing with 768 behind to develop 8 bell rhythm
  • Methods – plain courses, touches and then different methods
Introductory Exercises

The first opportunity for the ringer to do this is when ringing call changes; the ringer need not be ringing the tenor at this time. Kaleidoscope ringing also provides an opportunity for a ringer to cover to two bells making long places, places or dodging. To find out more about Kaleidoscope Ringing see Level 2 – Teaching foundation skills. Ringing the tenor in rounds will help the ringer get his or her ear tuned in to listening to themselves in 6th place. Always make sure the ringer is counting their place in rounds.

Covering to Doubles

Diagram of Cloister Doubles with a Grandsire start

Once the ringer can cover to rounds and Call Changes and Kaleidoscope Ringing they can move on to covering to Plain Hunt. Let them stand behind the tenor ringer to learn to follow the ropesight. If the ringer finds difficulty in covering to Plain Hunt on 5 then it is possible to start with covering to hunting on 3 or 4 bells.

Once the ringer is striking well to covering to Plain Hunt on five they are ready to move on to cover to methods. Start with plain courses moving on to touches when the striking is accurate. Plain Bob has a coursing order most similar to Plain Hunt and may be a good method to start with. However other methods where a smaller number of bells come to the back may also be useful.

Cloisters Doubles or Stedman quick sixes is a method where only three bells (the 3, 4 and 5) come to the back providing easier ropesight for the learner – see diagram to the right.

Can ropesight be taught?

Ropesight is a visual skill. It is a skill learned through experience and cannot be learned from a book. The eyes gradually learn to pick up moving ropes in the periphery of their visual field. For this skill to develop, practice is needed and this takes time. Ringers will need varying amounts of practice to develop ropesightl; some will find it easier than others! It is our job as teachers to provide the amount of practice in the appropriate environment with sufficient support to ensure our ringers gain the skills required.

Teaching Tips
  • Get the ringer to stand behind the tenor ringer to watch and learn
  • During early attempts stand with the ringer to assist with the ropesight if the striking strays. A visual prompt, pointing or gesturing in the right general direction of the bell which should be followed can assist
  • By grading your teaching starting with something the ringer can do easily will enable them to achieve success. Some ringers will not need all the smaller steps or can move through them very swiftly
  • Remember all ringers will be different and you need to keep your teaching flexible
  • Making sure your ringer experiences success which will boost their confidence
  • Some ringers learn to cover by ringing with the rhythm and developing the ropesight over time and some pick up the ropesight earlier but need time to develop the feeling of the rhythm
Ringing a quarter peal on the tenor

You should ensure that your ringer is not merely memorising the pattern of bells coming to the back before they ring their first quarter peal. To be certain that they have developed the skill of covering make sure they can cover to touches of at least two different Doubles methods.

Once your ringer has developed the ropesight for covering and following different bells while staying in the same place themselves they will be ready to move on to developing their ropesight whilst their bell is changing place. They will be ready to move on to learn to Plain Hunt.

Pip Penney

3.3. Teaching ringers to plain hunt

What new theory will my ringer need to know?

Hunting is all about ringing at three different speeds:

  • Slower than rounds to hunt up
  • Quicker than rounds to hunt down
  • Rounds speed when lying behind

New jargon:

  • Hunt out, hunt up, or run out
  • Hunt in,  hunt down, or run in
  • Introduction to the blue line
  • Chance to introduce course and after bells
Getting the rhythm

The more your ringer can develop the rhythm of hunting the more easily they will be able to develop ropesight.

With accurate rhythm their rope will be in the correct relationship with the other ropes. The initial aim is for the ringer to ring good rhythmic Plain Hunt with Plain Hunt coursing order.

The development of this rhythm is a practical skill and will take time and repetition.
How many bells should I use to teach?

This is really down to you, your preferences and the ringer you are teaching. Some people start on three bells some go straight to 5. Those who teach via even bell methods will probably use 4 and then progress to 6 bells. The rhythm on an even number of bells feels quite different to on odd numbers. This is because on even numbers the bells lie at the back handstroke/backstroke, the first quick blow down from the back being a hand stroke, whilst on an odd number the bells lie at the back at backstroke then handstroke, the first quicker blow coming down from the back is at backstroke.

The feeling of both will need to be practised by your ringer but teachers will vary on when to introduce this practice. If the ringer learns to hunt on 4 bells early on they are building skills to help them move onto Minor methods later. If the ringer works only on odd bell hunting to start with they are likely to improve more quickly at that particular skill but will not have experienced the even bell rhythm which will help them move onto Minor later. Some teachers prefer to use odd bell hunting as they can be rung with the tenor behind which gives stability to the change as a whole and can be used with a less experienced band.

Building the skills – preparatory exercises
  • Practise ringing at three speeds on a tied bell or using a simulator and following another ringer (rounds speed, faster than rounds speed, slower than rounds speed.)
  • Practise changing speed. At handstroke by checking the rise of the sally to ring quicker and letting it rise more to ring slower. At backstroke by taking rope in at bottom and letting it out at the top.
  • Revise leading with an open hand and closed backstroke.
Place counting

The ringer should be encouraged to count their place in the row at all times. This is a hard skill and ringers are often resistant to attempting it. Even those ringers who are trying may find themselves struggling to count their place continuously.

Resource Tip

The theory of hunting can be explained with a white board and pens or you can use the PowerPoint slides which can be found in the Method Toolboxes. There are other resources such as charts and worksheets to help your ringers absorb the theory.

Pip Penney

3.4. Introducing Plain Bob Doubles in easy stages

When learning Plain Bob Doubles as the first method, a ringer often finds that being able to recall the four leads of the plain course whilst ringing is too much. By using short learning methods to introduce the various different pieces of work in Plain Bob Doubles the ringer does not have to be able to recall the whole forty changes of the plain course initially. 

Shorter methods make the whole task of learning a plain course less daunting. They can often be learned over a very short period of time, sometimes in one practice session, leading to a sense of achievement and confidence in ability to understand and recall the method. They also provide variety for the supporting ringers.

More information and cribsheets for each of these methods can be found in the method toolboxes.

Bastow Little Bob Minimus

This is very short, being only twelve changes long, making it easy to memorise. It is very simple and provides an excellent introduction to method ringing. The order of work for the working bells is dodge 3/4 up and dodge 3/4 down. Download cribsheet.

The ringer can usually ring this straight off if they have been familiar with looking at blue lines when learning to hunt and they can frequently perfect it within a few sessions. It may take as little as one practice to master and move on.

This method is also straight forward for the supporting ringers to learn. Only two other method ringers are required! If ringing on 6 bells, the 5 has to cover to just three working bells as the treble only makes seconds throughout. The tenor ringer can follow the 5 and practise ringing at the end of the change.

Bistow Little Bob Doubles

This short method is sixteen changes long and includes a third piece of work from the plain course, long fifths [four blows behind]. As with Plain Bob Doubles the bell ringing long fifths rings over the two bells dodging in 3/4. A ringer is likely to be familiar with this technique if they have previously learned to cover to a pair of bells dodging in earlier skills building exercises. Download cribsheet.

Wotsit

Wotsit is a short method devised by the Whiting Society. It is 18 changes long.

The working bells (2, 3 and 4) dodge 3/4 up, 3/4 down and make seconds. The treble hunts to thirds place and back to the front, whilst the 5 makes alternate fourths and long fifths over each pair of bells in turn as they dodge in 3/4. Download cribsheet.

Doodah

Doodah is another short teaching method devised by the Whiting Society.

The 2 makes seconds and long fifths alternately. The 3 and the 4 dodge 3/4 up, make long fifths and dodge 3/4 down. The treble hunts to fourth place and back to the front.

Within these four short methods there is an opportunity for the ringer to familiarise themselves with the four pieces of work in a plain course of Plain Bob Doubles. Download cribsheet.

Teaching Tip

These short teaching methods should be explained in the tower before the ringer takes hold to ring. Going through them with the ringer will help them to understand how a blue line can help them to learn a method. However, once this concept is understood the ringer should be encouraged to learn methods out of the tower, before arriving at practice.

Pip Penney

3.5. Introducing the bobs in Plain Bob Doubles

Splitting new skills into smaller bits allows the learner to tackle a new skill in palatable bites. This is valuable for all learning styles, in particular for those whose preference is kinaesthetic learning, i.e. learning more through hands-on experience than by verbal or visual instruction. To have the most flexibility you need to let go of the tradition that suggests that all touches must be true or at the very least start and stop in rounds. Practise what you need to practise in the most time-effective manner.

Here are two strategies for chunking the learning of calls, both involving repeating selected works. Whilst most will teach only bobs, do remember that Plain Bob Doubles does have a specific single (place notation 123). It’s very useful as it introduces the concept of more than one type of call early on and it also permits a wider variety of 120s to be rung. It has featured in the Ringing World Diary for a very long time but many ringers don’t seem to know about it.

Choose to put in calls which have a specific effect on the learner’s bell

The simplest example of this is to call two consecutive bobs.The 2 will run in twice – it merely plain hunts, but the difference is that the ringer must be mentally ready to either dodge 3-4 down OR run in if a bob is heard. Similarly the 3 with either make seconds or run out. The purpose of this exercise is that whenever they approach a piece of work they remind themselves of the work if there’s a call.

This can be developed in several ways. You may decide to call a bell to run in, then let a whole course be rung before again calling them to run in. Once they’ve grasped running in/out you could call a touch randomly requiring their bell to do either piece of work interspersed with plain leads. This clearly requires a longer piece of ringing but, as long as you’ve planned for it, why not? Whoever said Plain Bob Doubles touches can’t exceed 120 changes?

Having dealt with running in/out, move on to considering the work of the other two bells who will repeat a short course of work, i.e. make the bob or long fifths. This is a good time to visit the theory with a reminder that all “work” occurs at the treble’s lead (one ringer told me that before she learned to ring inside she thought “bob” was a reminder to the treble to lead!) The theory will reveal why 2 and 3 hunt through the lead end and “do it next time”, whereas after a bell makes the bob it rings long fifths next. The concept of “place bell” can be usefully established and is good preparation for more advanced methods in the future.

Using “Bayles” or its close relation “Thingummy” – techniques also known as “Groundhog Day”

These are simply ways to start ringing Plain Bob Doubles and then at any point have the band repeat a specific lead over and over in isolation before either calling “stand” or issuing a call that tells the band to drop back into Plain Bob Doubles. A key issue here is ensuring that communication is clear. Some towers use it a lot but in some places there may be hesitance, often due to long-standing ringers being unfamiliar with it or reluctant to try “new-fangled ideas”. If it’s not part of the tower’s regular diet rehearse it first with a band who can ring Plain Bob Doubles and then ask someone to give their rope to the new ringer.

Resource Tips

You can find details of these and other “stepping stone” methods in the Methods Toolboxes.

Pip Penney

4. Looking after the band

Keep your ringers ringing

Your new ringer has learned to handle a bell and is now ready to ring rounds with others.The next stage of their learning experience will be very different. The teacher and new ringer have been working together intensively on a one to one basis, with the ringer at the centre of the teacher’s attention. Now the learning curve will flatten out. As the ringer progresses towards elementary change ringing they will have to wait their turn to ring on practice nights and progress often seems hard to achieve, leading to frustration. Interest and motivation often wane...

Keep ALL your ringers ringing

Every activity wants to keep the numbers of participants as high as possible and keep people involved for as long as possible. Ringing is no exception we want to retain the ringers we recruit. What is the best way of  retaining and motivating developing ringers?

Are we giving our ringers what they really, really want?

Do our ringers come ringing purely for the pleasure of the ringing itself? The likelihood is that most of them do not. You might think that it will depend on the standard of the ringing they are involved in but it is not that straightforward.

What type of ringers do you teach?

Specific types of ringers need different coaching approaches. Accepting the fact that as a ringing teacher you are unlikely to be able to become an expert coach for all of the different groups, how do you cater for the various coaching requirements of different types of ringers?

Improving retention and extending performance

The latest research shows that more people stay actively involved if their training changes with the developmental stage they are at, and the different rates of progress ringers make. This creates a larger pool of people who remain actively involved, and from whom high-end performers and experts can emerge over an extended period.

Why do ringers lapse?

Alison Smedley has carried out a piece of action research as part of a BA course in Charity and Social Enterprise Management with Anglia Ruskin University in which she identified bellringing as: 'A voluntary activity which seemed to have a particular problem with retention of its participants is that of bell ringing'.

4.1. Keep your ringers ringing

How to take the step from novice to improver

The new ringer has learned to handle a bell and is now ready to ring rounds with others. The next stage of their learning experience will be very different. The teacher and new ringer have been working together intensively on a one to one basis. The new ringer has been at the centre of the teacher’s attention.

Now the learning curve will flatten out. As the ringer progresses towards elementary change ringing they will have to wait their turn to ring on practice nights. Progress often seems hard to achieve, which can lead to frustration. Interest and motivation often wane.

As the keen new ringer or novice moves on to become a developing ringer or improver the teacher faces a big challenge in keeping the ringer interested and motivated. In any activity this is a time when participants drop out.
Developing self awareness in our ringers

A good teacher must be aware of these potential problems and encourage the developing ringer to become self aware, both of bell handling style and listening, so that good striking can be developed independently even if the teacher is not present. A simulator is an excellent way to help a developing ringer tune into intrinsic feedback and help improve listening skills. The ringer can start by ringing the tenor behind. As the skill develops the ringer can ring an inside bell in rounds and over time can move on to ringing Plain Hunt, methods and larger numbers of bells.

Teachers should help the developing ringer to use his or her own internal (intrinsic) feedback through the ears to improve listening skills and help improve striking.

In the tower, listening and striking can be developed on as few as 3 or 4 bells. The advantage of using low numbers of bells is that few helpers are required and it is easy to distinguish the sound of one bell. Arranging practices for the obvious benefit of one or two developing ringers helps to reinforce the feeling that they are valued as individuals, which is in itself motivating.

Kaleidoscope sequences can be used such as Treble Bob Hunt or Cambridge front work can be used to develop the skill of moving the bell with accuracy. These training sessions have the added advantage of adding variety to the developing ringers’ experience that will help to maintain interest.

Improving understanding

A ringer’s curiosity can be satisfied by understanding the background to ringing. Theory should be taught to promote understanding and maintain interest. During later stages this accumulation of understanding will assist in the learning of more advanced methods. At each stage, teachers should ensure the ringer’s practical skills are under-pinned by theoretical knowledge.

Opportunity to assist with maintenance tasks in the belfry and through this gain an understanding of the mechanics of bells may be of interest to some ringers and help them to feel more involved.

Changes in the teaching relationship

Novices do not know what they do not know yet! They tend to hang on to every word and demonstration of the teacher. However, as they develop and learn more, often their self-image changes. The underlying problem is that the developing ringer may have sufficient understanding to achieve current performance but insufficient understanding to realise or accept that things are worth improving and how much skill they still need to develop.

There is often a dilemma at this stage between what the ringer “wants to learn” versus what the teacher feels the ringer “needs to learn”. Ringers often want to move on to ringing more complex methods before they can ring the methods they are currently practising with accuracy.

Ringer’s expectations – what are the ringer’s goals?

A teacher should develop goals with the ringer. A teacher cannot expect a ringer to accept a training programme if it has merely been imposed on them. Discussion with the developing ringer is crucial. By forcing expectations on to a ringer a teacher runs the risk of scaring ringers off. Learning the Ropes provides a system of progressive goals for teachers to use with their ringers.

Broader horizons – ringing out and about

There comes a point where the developing ringer has a good enough basic technique and foundation skills for the teacher to start to encourage them to go out and about to other practices. Up to this point the teacher has been ever present – teaching, motivating, reminding, demonstrating good practice. But now the ringer is frequently without this support. All too easily striking can start to slip if other ringers around don’t exhibit good striking.

As ringers move on to the world of change ringing they are often less interested in how they are ringing and more interested in learning new methods. Bad habits can easily appear, undermining prospects for future performance.

If someone learns to ring in a band where the striking is poor they will have less opportunity for learning to strike well. In these cases there is a risk that the ringers are likely to get bored and under-stimulated, to lose motivation and to stop ringing.

Pydar Improvers

In the Deanery of Pydar in Cornwall, Phil Tremain runs a group called Pydar Improvers (Pimps for short). Ringers start at the point when they can ring rounds. The group is designed for those who can benefit from extra practice in a friendly and supportive environment. The improvers have the opportunity to ring with experienced helpers. One of Phil’s objectives is to make these practices “something people want to be at”.

The band at neighbouring Padstow had dwindled to a few ringers. Brian Woods recruited and trained several new ringers. These ringers now ring with the Pydar Improvers, greatly benefiting from the extra ringing and enjoying the social side of the outings.

Similar opportunities for developing ringers can be created, for example, by extra sessions at ringing centres or dedicated courses run over several weeks.

The transition from novice to improver is a high-risk time for losing ringers. By paying particular attention to a ringer during this period we may help more ringers progress to the point where they are really enjoying their ringing and are less likely to give up.

Pip Penney

4.2. Keep ALL your ringers ringing

Every activity wants to keep the numbers of participants as high as possible and keep people involved for as long as possible. Ringing is no exception. We want to retain the ringers we recruit. The traditional model in ringing development is the Pyramidal Model.

The Pyramidal Model – high "burn out" rates

In this model there are fewer participants as progress advances. The drive is to improve performance with a wide initial base and an increasing dropout rate. Constant pressure to progress means this model is associated with a high “burn out” rate, with many participants unable to progress and leaving the activity.

Traditional pyramidal model

The Pyramidal Model is no longer seen as an efficient way of producing high-end performers. Research has shown that early talent is not necessarily a good predictor of eventual performance, with many high performers emerging late.This can be seen in ringing when people return to ringing after many years and then make quick progress with method learning.

There has been a significant amount of research done over recent decades into different approaches to maintaining participant numbers in various activities.

The needs of the participant change as the person grows from child to teenager to adult and then on to older adult. The needs of the participant change depending on the stage of progress they are at, for instance if they are a beginner, a ringer who wants to ring for Sunday service but has no desire to learn more methods, a keen ringer who is developing skills fast or a high performer.

The Participants' Needs Model – increased number of people participating

Researchers such as Professor Istvan Balyi have developed new ideas to encourage lifelong participation and thus to increase numbers of participants. These ideas have been taken on by UK Coaching. Various groups such as The British Canoe Union and British Cycling have applied these research findings to their own activities.

The result of this research has been new ways of thinking about the development of the individual participant, the Participants’ Needs Model.

Participants needs model

This model of development is built around the requirements of the individual at every stage of their development. More people stay involved, there are many pathways to excellence and the emphasis is placed on personal goals. The needs of those who wish to participate for mainly recreational reasons are catered for, as well as those who are ambitious to progress.

Both models lead to an equal proportion of those who perform at a high level but the Participants Needs Model leads to a greater number of people participating, via various diverse pathways.

The model develops and recognises various “recreational pathways” which keep people participating without always having to progress at certain particular points in time. Coaches are encouraged to show increased respect for the wishes of the recreational participant and to adapt their coaching style to incorporate their needs. These ringers should be coached with a view to “sustaining participation”. Goals for these ringers would be less ambitious in terms of learning new methods than for those for ringers following a “progressive pathway”. They would include improving performance at current level of advancement, i.e. what has already been learned and diversifying at a similar level, rather than concentrating on advancing to more complicated ringing.

In this manner individuals become free to enjoy their ringing without constant pressure to learn more. At certain stages in individual’s lives the pressure for constant advancement may become more than people want and can prove counterproductive, leading to “burn out” and the loss of that ringer. By providing for the needs of the ringer who has no ambition to advance their method ringing at that point we are more likely to keep them participating in the activity. It may be that later, a time may come when a ringer will become more motivated and move on to follow a progressive pathway again.

By coaching to “sustain participation” of those who have temporarily moved onto a recreational pathway, we will ensure that those ringers will remain involved and will be in a position to return to a progressive pathway at some point in the future moving forwards with their method ringing once more, rather than being lost to ringing.

Pip Penney

4.3. Are we giving our ringers what they really, really want?

Do our ringers come ringing purely for the pleasure of the ringing itself? The likelihood is that most of them do not. You might think that it will depend on the standard of the ringing they are involved in but it is not that straightforward!

In 1993, McCullagh et al published research that studied the deeper reasons for people participating in hobbies and pastimes. These reasons or incentives are:

  • Affiliation
  • Mastery
  • Desire for sensation
  • Desire for self direction
  • Social comparison

What do these titles actually mean to us when we are teaching in the tower? How can knowledge of them improve our new ringer retention rates?

Affiliation
Affiliation is based on a desire to have positive and friendly relationships with others; to be part of a group or a band.

Many loyal Sunday service ringers will be in this category. These are the ringers who will turn up to ring for Christmas, be it midnight mass or Christmas morning service.

It is the social side of ringing which makes these ringers continue ringing and it may be that progressing to ring more methods and more complicated methods is not their priority; this attitude should be respected. Too much pressure to make progress may prove counter-productive and may actually disincentive this type of ringer.

To incentivise these ringers, ringing teachers should ensure they feel a valued member of the band, perhaps having a special role, be it formal, such as social secretary or informal, such as having responsibility for opening up for visiting ringers or winding the church clock.

Mastery
These ringers wish to improve their skills, master new skills and pursue excellence. These ringers are characterised by wanting to do something well for its own sake.

This is the group from whom our expert ringers are likely to develop. These ringers will be keen to improve their striking, and respond well to goals set to monitor performance, such as ringing quarter peals and peals, which will be taken as an acknowledged measure of their achievements.

Desire for sensation
These ringers are incentivised by a desire for sensation; they gain their pleasure from the very act of ringing the bells and from the sounds, sights and excitement of being in a belfry.

These are the ringers who just want to ring and they will ring as often as they can. Tower grabbers frequently exhibit this motivation. This group of ringers also like variety during practice sessions and will be interested in learning new methods.

To incentivise these ringers, the ringing teacher should at take them to other towers or to group practices and later should arrange outings and tours. Within the practice, novel ringing activities will motivate the early ringer and when they are more experienced, learning a variety of new methods will hold their interest.

Desire for self-direction
Ringers who fall into this category wish to feel a sense of control or to be in charge.

These ringers may attend a practice outside their own tower and start giving advice to the local ringers without the permission of the Tower Captain.

To incentivise the self directed ringer, the ringing teacher should give them a position of responsibility and create situations where they have certain decision making powers, such as standing behind less experienced ringers, calling things or organising quarter peals or special practices.

If the teacher observes that they this type of ringer in the tower they can start to craft them a role that will fulfill this need. If the ringer is not sufficiently competent to take a position of leadership with a ringing related role, other, non-ringing roles will cater for their need. For example they may be made responsible for arranging social activities or ensuring there are sufficient ringers for services.

Social comparison
Some people participate in an activity because it provides them with an opportunity to compare themselves with others.

These people are most happy when they can demonstrate that they are better than somebody else. Such ringers are happiest when they can demonstrate that they are better than somebody else. They will enjoy striking competitions and being high up on the annual list of peal ringers. They may seek out an environment where they are able to demonstrate that they are better than others and may prefer to be a “big fish in a small pond”.

Resource Tips

Have a browse through the recruitment and retention resources to explore practical ways of keeping your ringers interested.

Pip Penney

4.4. Improving retention and extending performance

The latest research shows that more people stay actively involved if the training follows a participants’ needs led model. This approach to training creates a larger pool of people who remain actively involved and from whom high-end performers and experts can emerge over an extended.

How much do we think about our ringers’ needs?

The ringers we teach will comprise of very many different types of people. Their ages will cover a wide year span, their backgrounds and life experiences will be different, the stage they have reached with their ringing will be wide ranging and their aspirations will vary.

Some of us will be teaching locally at towers where the standard of ringing is not very advanced whilst some of us will be teaching, or to use a more accurately descriptive word, coaching, at the top end bringing ringers on to ring complicated methods, to higher numbers of bells and to ring extended lengths, quarter peals and peals.

Stages of development

When people start to learn an activity there are various stages that have been identified as their skills develop:

  • Novice
  • Advanced Beginner
  • Competent Performer
  • Expert

How many of these stages do you have to adapt your coaching to cover in your own tower?

As we have already identified the aspirations of our various ringers will vary as will their rate of progress.The rate of progress will depend partly on the ringer’s natural ability and partly on how much ringing he or she participates in. It will also be affected by the quality of the coaching and the quality of the other ringers involved.

Once ringers have passed through the beginner stage some will immediately continue to develop and go on to become top end performers. This route is known as “early talent development”. These ringers need to be coached with a view to developing their performance and the role of the coach in these circumstances is “performance development coach”.

Other ringers will not develop so fast and may plateau; however, we still want to keep these ringers involved and participating in the local ringing. Our coaching approach to these ringers is very different to in the above example. These ringers need to be coached to sustain participation and the role of the coach in these circumstances is “participation coach”.

The Four Roles of a Coach
  • Performance Development Coach
  • Participation Coach
  • High Performance Coach
  • Children's Coach
Handling early talent

There is another route to high performance and becoming an expert. This route is known as the “late talent development route”. It is this route that helps to explain why it is so important to maintain participation.

Research has shown that early talent is not always a good predictor of eventual expert performance.

Whether the ringer makes progress through the early talent development route or the late talent development route at some point that ringer is going to need coaching for this high level of performance. The role of the coach in these circumstances is “high performance coach”.

Passing through all these stages of development will be children and as we know the needs of children are different from the needs of adults. Thus we have to take on yet another coaching role that of “children’s’ coach”.

Our teaching has to be able to adapt to coaching all these different ringers and aspects of their learning but obviously each of us cannot be expect to become expert coaches in all of the above areas.

Which area of coaching do you need to deliver to your ringers? Next time we will take a look at coping with all these different aspects of coaching ringing.

Pip Penney

4.5. What type of ringers do you teach?

Specific types of ringers need different coaching approaches. Accepting the fact that as a ringing teacher you are unlikely to be able to become an expert coach for all of the different groups, how do you cater for the various coaching requirements of different types of ringers?

Performance development coach

If you are teaching ringers who are moving on fast, who are eager to progress, your role is that of performance development coach. You will need to encourage your ringers to ring frequently and once they have reached the standard of the upper end of the home tower they will need to attend other practices to develop their skills. As the coach you can introduce them to other practices, send them on courses or run courses for them, identify a suitable practice for them to attend on a regular basis where their skills can be developed and arrange quarter peals and peals for them. It may be possible to find an advanced ringer who will mentor them and bring them on further.

ART provides off the shelf course materials in the form of Method Toolboxes, which cover from Plain Hunt to Surprise Minor and provide everything you need for your developing ringers. These toolboxes contain teacher resources, student resources, a PowerPoint presentation which covers the theory sections, plus, teacher notes.

Participation coach

If your ringers are not in the mindset to be keen to progress for whatever reason, you must use a different approach. These ringers may be long-term ringers who have got as far as they wish to go at the current point in time or may be just unambitious and not willing to put much effort into self-development. They are often valued Sunday service ringers. Your role will be to coach to “sustain participation”.

The social side of ringing needs to be considered. You as their coach should ensure these ringers have plenty of opportunity to make friends within ringing. It is this which will keep them coming along to practices and Sunday service ringing. You need to ensure that these ringers feel valued, have a role and enjoy themselves. Going down the pub after practice is a good policy, outings to other towers and other parts of the country will provide variety and maintain interest. Summer BBQs and Christmas meals have their role to play.

Other ways to help people feel involved may be to give them a specific role, such as, social secretary, tower treasurer, steeple keeper or Sunday service band organiser.

Children’s coach

Children’s coaching needs are different and may be met by a youth group. If you are coaching children is there a provision for their needs locally? If not could you identify a person who would be willing to establish a youth group?

High performance coach

Once ringers start to be capable of ringing at the expert stage it is likely that to be able to progress to their full potential they will need to ring at a tower with ten or twelve bells and have opportunity to have a high powered band to ring with. These ringers include the “giants of the future", ringers who may become 12 bell striking competition ringers or peal conductors. This level of coaching can only be provided by ringers who are themselves ringing at the expert level and many ringing teachers will be unable to aspire to such a level. In this instance, unless you are a “high performance coach” yourself, you will need to find someone who is and a tower which would welcome your ringer. Your role here as the best coach for that particular ringer is actually to pass them on to a coach with the appropriate skills to take their ringing forward.

How can we develop our skills to cover each coaching role?

One ringing coach may be an expert with children and not so suited to coaching high end performers; others may be good at bringing ringers on and developing performance and others good at maintaining a thriving Sunday service ringing band.

As we continue to teach we can develop our own effectiveness as coaches. Reflective practice, that is to say reviewing what we have done, how successful we consider it to be and how we could improve on it for the future will help us improve our coaching skills.

Coaching skills will develop on an informal level through our own experience and through observing others teach. Group teaching may be useful here. Coaches can also go out to other towers or attend courses as observers as part of the process of developing their own skills. Teaching and coaching skills can be developed through more formal routes such as attending courses and lectures such as those provided by ART at their Annual Conference.

As ringing teachers continue with the coaching process, an understanding of some of the underlying issues will help them to develop their own skills further.

The importance of incremental learning

Whatever level you are teaching at, whether your role is to sustain participation, or improve performance it is necessary to take your ringers through an incremental learning pathway (learning in small stages, each one built on the skills developed at the previous stage). In this way you will ensure that your ringers [whatever level of performance they are at] will have the appropriate theoretical grounding and skills development to allow them to progress to the highest level of performance if they have the will and the capability.

If you are currently training a ringer with a view to “sustaining participation” incremental learning is important. This ringer may, at a later date, move onto the “late talent development route” requiring coaching which is performance oriented and may even move forwards onto a “high performance development pathway” and require the attentions of a “high performance coach”.

Re-entry into ringing

In ringing there are a certain number of ringers who learn as children or teenagers and then stop ringing when they go to university or for other reasons. They may be uninvolved with ringing for years, often many years. When they re-enter ringing, provided their previous training provided them with the appropriate foundation skills built through incremental learning these ringers will be in a good position to move onto a “progressive pathway”. They frequently move through the “late talent development route”, this progress is facilitated by good foundations skills developed many years before.

The Learning the Ropes scheme provided by Association of Ringing Teachers to all those who are ART Members or who have attended a Day Course provides teachers with the resources and guidance to ensure their ringers are well equipped to develop the foundation skills required to move on to progressive pathways of ringing development and have the opportunity to go on to become the top end ringers for the future.

Pip Penney

4.6. Why do ringers lapse?

Alison Smedley has carried out a piece of action research as part of a BA course in Charity & Social Enterprise Management with Anglia Ruskin University – 'A voluntary activity which seemed to have a particular problem with retention of its participants is that of bell ringing'.

Download a copy of Alison's report

5. About teaching and learning

Giving feedback – mind your language

Feedback is an important teaching tool. Without feedback, it is difficult for a ringer to understand and modify their ringing. Learners who obtain feedback tend to perform more consistently over the long term.

Using feedback loops to enhance your teaching – IDEAS for teaching handling

One way of using feedback loops to enhance learning is the IDEAS model – Introduction, Demonstration, Explanation, Action, Summary – which helps to identify learning objectives and encourages focused teaching on key points.

Catch, pull and hold on

Ringing terminology is seductive. The more we use it, the less we are aware that to the uninitiated it can mean something completely different. The worst case is when the intended meaning overlaps the perceived meaning. A good example is ‘Hold’. The dictionary says it is to ‘keep fast; grasp’ Is that really what we want? I know a number of ringers who ‘keep fast and grasp’ the tail end with terrible consequences at handstroke, and others who are so worried about not keeping the tail end fast and grasping it, that they can barely ring as they focus on holding the rope...

Engage in some reflective practice

Do you reflect on how you could improve your teaching? Do you take for granted that your teaching is OK? Do you discuss your teaching with others? As you teach more and more, your skills will improve, however it is useful for all teachers and coaches to engage in some degree of reflection. This reflection may lead to a certain openness to new ideas and help to improve your skills as a teacher.

Learning how we learn

Teachers increasingly use research from cognitive psychology to inform how they teach. Cognitive psychology covers the study of the mind, including perception, attention and memory. How can this help you?

Get going with goals

Goal setting has been shown to be one of the most important motivational tools a tutor or coach can use when developing the skills of a participant in an activity. The principles of goal setting are generic and apply across the board to many activities including ringing.

Get GROWing with goals

Using goals when teaching is one of the most effective ways to motivate those learning. What factors will make the use of goal setting work better for your ringers?

Score from successful goals

Discover the various types of goals which can be used and when each type of goal might be useful when teaching ringers. Do you have a long term goal for your ringers or for your band? What do you think of when you set goals for your ringers? How do you plan the actions necessary to achieve long term goals?

5.1. Giving feedback – mind your language

Feedback is an important teaching tool when progressing a learner with their ringing. Without feedback it is difficult for a ringer to understand and modify their ringing. Learners who obtain feedback tend to perform more consistently over the long term.

Verbal feedback

One type of feedback which a ringer will receive is verbal feedback from the teacher. This verbal feedback can be positive, negative or neutral (informational with no positive or negative connotations, such as: "remember to keep your handstroke lead open.") Both positive and negative feedback have their role in teaching but care must be taken as to the result the feedback has on the ringer’s attitude to further learning. Feedback is a powerful tool and should be used carefully and thoughtfully.

Positive feedback can:

  • Motivate ringers
  • Reinforce the desired technique – e.g. good leading or striking
  • Correct technique

Positive feedback provides encouragement; ringers like to receive praise especially when it is sincere and honest.

Negative feedback can:

  • Demotivate ringers
  • Change attitudes for the worse
  • Undermine a ringer’s confidence

Negative feedback does not encourage ringers, may be counterproductive to their motivation and contribute to them giving up easily.

Self-confidence

Teachers want their ringers to:

  • Be enthusiastic and take a positive attitude
  • Show perseverance even when things are hard to learn
  • Attempt challenging tasks such as moving on to a larger number of bells, learn new and more complex methods or learn the Standard 8.

To be able to act in this way the ringer must feel confident in their own ability to succeed. Self-confidence is an indicator of the fact that the ringer believes in their own ability. There is a clear relationship between self-confidence and success. This means that teachers need to concern themselves with building self-confidence in their ringers. The behaviour of the teacher will have a strong effect on the self-confidence of a ringer.

Teachers should give out the message that all ringers can improve and succeed with practice and application. To help maintain self-confidence the teacher needs to ensure that the ringer feels they are of value to the teacher no matter where the ringer is in terms of skill development and how advanced their ringing might be.

The way in which the teacher uses feedback will affect the way the learner feels. It should be the aim of a teacher to use feedback in a manner which leaves the ringer feeling positive.

Don't say don't

“DON’T” is one of the most negative words a teacher can use! Used frequently it will demotivate, especially during the early stages of learning to ring and when learning to handle a bell. Unfortunately, it is commonly used! Teachers are notorious for recognising and correcting errors more often than noticing correct aspects of movements. The positive aspects of performance should be recognised and used in the feedback to the ringer.

Teachers should avoid the use of the word “Don’t” where ever possible.

Teachers should not use sarcasm and should never, never shout at a ringer unless there is an unsafe situation that requires immediate action.

The next time you are teaching, see if you can count how many times you use the word “Don’t”.

The use of ‘Good – Better – How’ provides the teacher with a suitable technique

How could you phrase your feedback to avoid using the word, "don't?" A teacher should start with what was good about the ringer’s performance or attitude, next should come better - what needs to be improved - and following that how - guidance on what the ringer should do to improve performance. This feedback should be followed up with the opportunity to practise what needs to be improved.

Immediate feedback is more useful for improving performance than delayed feedback; if the feedback is delayed it is more likely that the ringer will have forgotten exactly how they performed.

And remember that feedback must be accurate but to be effective the ringer must be in the right frame of mind to accept the feedback being given.

To make the feedback more acceptable to the ringer, verbal feedback can be thought of in terms of a sandwich:

  • Good – first the teacher makes a positive comment to attune the ringer to forthcoming comments (feedback). This is represented by the top piece of bread.
  • Better – the teacher gives the feedback about what needs to be worked on. This is represented the sandwich filling.
  • How – the teacher provides the advice and the opportunity for the ringer to improve their performance. This is represented by the underneath piece of bread.

Pip Penney

5.2. Catch, pull and hold on

Ringing terminology is seductive. The more we use it, the less we are aware that to the uninitiated (including those we teach) it can mean something completely different. The worst case is when the intended meaning overlaps the perceived meaning.

Catch

A good example is ‘catch’ as in ‘catch the sally’. Experienced ringers use the phrase without thinking about it. It is just a verbal label for the complex, semi-automatic action that starts with our hands on the tail end and ends with them on the sally. But when we use that phrase as teachers, our pupils don’t hear it as a label for an action they already know, because they haven’t yet learnt it. They hear the phrase as an instruction telling them what to do, and they interpret the words in terms of their everyday meanings.

Outside of ringing, ‘catch’ conjures up images of a coat being snagged on barbed wire, a fish taking the bait, or a cat pouncing on a mouse. None of these convey the desired action where the hands move up at the correct time and speed for them to close smoothly around the sally as they continue to move up with it.

So if we tell our pupils to ‘catch’ the sally, should we be surprised to see hands springing up to grab it, or hovering at chest height motionless ready to snatch it as it passes?

The benefit of introducing the transfer action with a stationary rope is being able to take the pupil through it in slow motion, with time to emphasise the smoothness of the action. It’s a shame to lose that by using conflicting language when the pupil makes the difficult step of doing it at full speed with a live rope.

Far better to use language that conveys the intended feel of the action. The hands should ‘rise towards’ the sally, ‘meet’ the sally, ‘close round’ the sally. If the timing isn’t quite right, the hands need to ‘rise earlier’ and ‘arrive higher on the sally’ (or vice versa).

So let’s leave all talk of ‘catching’ for stories about the riverbank or the mouse hole.

Pull

My dictionary defines this word as ‘to exert force upon’. The problem with this word is twofold. First, learners often arrive with a preconceived idea that bell ringing requires pulling hard and possibly even leaving the floor – a replacement perhaps for going to the gym. Maybe this is suggested by the media or adverts for Mars bars. Secondly, ‘pull’ implies that the concentration and effort is a downward movement – pulling the rope down. We forget that controlling the backstroke and sally as they rise is just as important.

We need to emphasise that to control the rope and therefore the bell we need to keep tension on the rope for as long as we can.

Only by doing this can we engage with the bell – i.e. ‘feel it’ and this is what we are trying to teach. We are trying to teach a skill not something that can only be practiced by strong young farmers!

So ‘pull’ is a word on my amber – use with care – list. There are plenty of alternatives. For adults you accelerate the hands down to keep tension and de-accelerate as the rope rises for the same reason. You only have to draw your hands down a little faster or for longer to get the bell to go up. Those descriptions describe more effectively what you are trying to achieve without giving your learner ideas of muscle building.

Hold on!

Bell ringing terminology can be a secret code to the outsider and so often we take for granted an understanding of what we mean when we use, what are to us, are familiar words. When we teach, if we are to communicate well, we have to place ourselves in the position of the learner and ensure the words we use are fully understood. We may even have to modify normal understanding of some words and phrases to generate the correct action from the beginner

My pet hate is ‘hold’. The dictionary says it is to ‘keep fast; grasp (especially in hands or arms)’. But is that really what we want? I know a number of ringers who ‘keep fast and grasp’ the tail end with terrible consequences at handstroke, and others who are so worried about not ‘keeping the tail end fast and grasping it’ that they can barely ring as they focus on holding the rope. They often spend a fair time with rope flailing around putting the ringer next to them in danger!

This problem originates from the very beginning. Your new learner – who knows nothing about ringing – has just had a tour of the bells and is keen to get hands on a rope. There is a discussion about being right or left handed and when decided he (or she!) is told that the left (or right) hand will ‘hold’ the rope. They go on to do backstrokes and maybe other exercises. But they will remember the first instruction of their teacher, mentor and fount of all knowledge. Wishing to ensure they prove they are listening and are keen to achieve, they will ensure that at all times the rope is ’held’ (keep fast; grasp) in their hand. They will achieve this and ‘hold’ at all costs and not let go or relax their grip! Getting them to open their fingers later on will be a struggle and you will have to do many hand transfer exercises!

But back to our learner – they are happy; they have done as instructed and when they return home after their first taste of ringing they will tell the family what they have learned – to HOLD onto the rope and PULL – a lesson they will never forget.

Is that what we wanted? Really we wanted them to understand tension and keeping the rope straight by drawing it right down. But no we have taught them to hold on tight and pull!

Strangely you don’t have to find an alternative word – when you have sorted out which hand goes above which on the rope and do exercises and backstrokes the H word is not required. Much care has to be taken when doing the hand transfer movement and introducing handstrokes to avoid its use. Sometimes you may have to just say ‘it rests’ in your hand if you need to. Or it stays there. Much more relaxed words that make the learner feel they don’t have to concentrate on ‘holding’ it!

John Harrison & Graham Nabb

5.3. Use feedback loops to enhance your teaching - IDEAS for teaching handling

IDEAS

In early lessons a teIDEAS.jpgacher can teach using IDEAS.

  • Introduction
  • Demonstration
  • Explanation
  • Action
  • Summary

By teaching with IDEAS the teacher can ensure that each learner gets sufficient information to start off with the activity.

IDEAS in practice

An example of using IDEAS to teach is when teaching hand transfers between the sally and the tail end.

Introduction

This should be short and succinct – “This exercise is to teach you how to transfer your hands from the sally to the tail end after ringing the handstroke”.

Demonstration

This should be performed at normal speed and be repeated so that the new ringer can see the movement from every angle. This demonstration gives the new ringer a rough idea of the overall shape and timings for the action. First impressions are hard to change so the first demo is extremely important.

Explanation

The explanation emphasises the key points. This can be talked through using positioning of the hands on the sally and rope when the bell is down.“The hands should remain close together at all times – the tail end should be in the cleft between the thumb and side of the hand visible on the ringers side of the sally – as the hands leave the sally they should move quickly and vertically down to a low and central finishing position at the bottom of the stroke – the top hand has to overtake the lower hand and join the rope underneath”.

Activity

The new ringer then imitates the movement. The activity phase should be the largest part of the whole process. It should start with the ringer performing the actions in slow motion on a static rope with the bell down.

Once they have got the idea they can transfer on to practise on a bell that is up. [In this case the new ringer is just practising pulling off the handstroke and ringing the following backstrokes, the teacher sets the bell.] If the ringer is having difficulty taking hold with the correct grip the teacher may have to position their hands on the sally and place the tail end in the correct position. It should be noted that the activity phase will help the learner to get the idea of what is required. It is important for every learner to be given sufficient time to practise and develop the skill.

Summary

This is the review of the exercise and should involve input from the ringer and the teacher. The ringer can explain how it felt to them, what was difficult and what was straightforward. The teacher can use the summary as an opportunity to give feedback to the ringer as to what was good in the performance and what still needed to be worked on.

Spotlighting

This can be used during the explanation or as a means of feedback before the ringer attempts the action again.

Spotlighting involves focusing the ringer’s attention on one particular aspect of the action, such as the movement of the top hand as it leaves the sally and joins the rope at the bottom of the movement. For example the teacher might say “Watch the top hand now – see how it has to overtake the other hand to get to the bottom of the stroke to join with the other hand on the tail end”.

This feedback and spotlighting process can be used again in a loop, each time focusing on a particular part of the action, such as the grip on the sally or the finishing position on the tail end, becoming more specific as to what the ringer should focus on.

Pip Penney

5.4. Learning how we learn

Teachers are looking more and more to research in cognitive psychology to inform their practice. Cognitive psychology is usually defined as the study of the mind, including perception, attention and memory. This field of research can help us to understand learning by testing hypotheses about learning strategies that are developed based on what we already know about the mind (Weinstein & Sumeracki, 2019). There are four important learning strategies that have recently moved from theory into practice and which have implications for all teachers. These learning strategies are outlined below with suggestions on how they relate to learning to ring.

Cognitive load theory

There are two important components of memory – long-term memory and working memory. Working memory is where thinking takes place, where information that is actively being processed before it moves to long-term memory for hopefully long-term storage. Working memory is finite. On average, your working memory can hold about seven ‘bits’ of information and only holds them for approximately 20 seconds. This limit of working memory means that it can quickly become over-loaded when dealing with new tasks. This is known as cognitive load theory. Structuring complex tasks by limiting the amount of new information can reduce this cognitive load.

One way to reduce cognitive load when teaching ringing is to break down a task so that the student can tackle it step-by-step. The ART Training Scheme already breaks down activities into several small steps. For example, teaching bell handling is broken down into many stages and exercises. More stages than in the way many of us were perhaps taught; by learning the backstroke, the handstroke and then both strokes together.

This theory of breaking tasks down will work for all stages of ringing, such as Call Changes, Plain Hunt and even the most complex of methods. Learning a place bell, calls, circle of work, etc. are all steps that can be learnt in stages rather than everything at once.

It is important to help students to shift learning from working to long-term memory. The next three theories suggest strategies for doing just this.

Spaced review

Learning everything to do with a topic during a single time period is not as effective as distributed learning (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Spaced review involves revisiting a topic after a ‘forgetting gap’ and strengthens long-term memory. A simple way to manage this is to build in review time to each teaching session, including reviewing learning from the previous week, month and/or further ago.

As we all know, intensive sessions work. Less of a gap between handling sessions in particular will help ensure that working memory moves to long-term memory. It is ok to revisit some of the smaller, earlier stages again and build them back together. For example, if a new ringer has managed to ring alone during the previous lesson, a good starting point would be to revisit single strokes at the beginning of the lesson before putting them together again. This will also build confidence. It is also good to review the learner’s logbook to remind them what they have learnt already.

For method ringing, good examples would be to practise a plain course before ringing a touch or waiting until the latest point before adding a call. Practising half a course or ringing a different bell to practise different place bells is also a good idea.

Retrieval practice

Repeatedly re-reading a text is not an effective way of learning. It is much more effective to try to retrieve what you already know from memory (Roedinger & Karpicke, 2006). Retrieval practice involves retrieving something you have learnt in the past and bringing it back to mind. Students are using retrieval practice every time they undertake a test. Using frequent, short and importantly, low-stakes tests causes students to retrieve knowledge on a regular basis. Any activities that require students to draw on past knowledge can have the same effect.

Theory is so important! Ringers will learn methods quicker and move onto more complex methods if they understand them. Writing methods out, the circle of work, treble passing are all good ways to make theory stick, far better than retaining memory from being talked at or reading text. Quick fire questions are also a great way to check understanding and to check reaction times that will need to be much quicker when they are actually ringing. “You’re ringing Plain Bob Doubles, you’re about to do a 3-4 up dodge, you hear the conductor call “bob!”, what do you do?” “Make the bob/make 4ths & in?” “Correct! What do you do next?” If they can recall the correct answers quickly, then they stand a far better chance of being able to remember when ringing it.

Elaborative interrogation

Elaboration involves describing and explaining in detail something that you have learnt. This approach supports learning by integrating new information with existing prior knowledge, helping to embed it in long-term memory. A well-studied form of elaboration is elaborative interrogation, which involves prompting students to generate an explanation by being asked ‘why?’ and ‘how?’ Studies have shown that learning effects are stronger when students generate answers to these questions themselves rather than being provided with the explanations.

In summary, regular reviews of learning, using low-stakes tests and asking students to explain what they have learnt can be very beneficial, helping to move learning from working memory to long-term memory. If they can hold on to that new knowledge and/or skill in their long-term memory then they have really learnt something. This is how we all learn new skills and methods and does not just apply to new ringers.

This theory can be used to check the learner’s understanding of how what they do on the end of a rope affects what the bell does and how a single stroke affects the next one. For example, it is sometimes counter-intuitive that to slow a bell down and ring a slow stroke, that you have to put more effort as opposed to riding a bike where less effort will make you go slower.

You can also check a ringer’s understanding of methods by getting them to recite what to do and randomly shout, “bob!” You can ask them to explain why they have to do what they do at a call. Recite a different place bell, etc. etc.

Jenny Wynn and Moira Johnson


References

Dunlosky, J. et al. (2013). Improving pupils’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14 (1) pp4-58.

Roedinger H. L. & Karpicke, J.D. (2006). Test enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science 17, pp249-255.

Weinstein, Y. & Sumeracki, M. (2019). Understanding how we learn. Routledge, Oxon.

5.5. Engage in some reflective practice

How much do you think about your teaching?

Do you reflect on how you could improve your teaching? Do you take for granted that your teaching is OK? Do you discuss your teaching with others?

As you teach more and more your skills will improve however it is contended that it is useful for all teachers and coaches to engage in some degree of reflection. This reflection may heighten a sense of self-awareness, leading to a“certain openness to new ideas” and helping to improve your skills as a teacher.

Before an individual can properly engage in reflective practice, three personal attributes need to be present [Dewey 1916].

Open mindedness
  • An active desire to listen to more sides than one
  • To give full attention to alternative possibilities
  • To recognise the possibility of error, even in beliefs dearest to us
Whole heartedness
  • Having a passion – being thoroughly interested in the subject
Integrity
  • Taking responsibility for the consequences of actions and accepting them. “Knowing that you are part of the problem means that you can also be part of the solution” – Wayne Smith, All Blacks rugby coach.
Type of questions

The type of questions the teacher asks themselves changes as experience is gained. Three levels of reflection have been identified [Ian Mauen 1977].

Technical level of reflection
  • What resources could I use to improve when teaching this task?
  • Did I achieve the goals I set myself for this session?
  • How could I fix this problem?
  • What could I change to ensure the practice starts/finishes on time?
  • Why don’t ringers want to engage with this activity – what is wrong with them?
  • Could I structure this activity better?
Practical level of reflection

This occurs when the teacher is approachable and flexible and when the teacher has developed an understanding of the effect of their own actions on other’s learning.

  • What is it about the way I have structured this practice session which does not appear to suit the ringers?
  • What other ways could I use to get my message across?
  • How does my own behaviour reinforce stereotypes?
  • What messages are portrayed by my posture and my appearance?
Critical level of reflection

This occurs when a teacher starts to see problems in context:

  • Why do I find some teaching practices ineffective, unfair or unethical despite the fact that they are accepted tradition?
  • Why is there a difference between the type of feedback I give to a more skilled ringer and a less skilled ringer?
  • Whose knowledge am I applying as I teach?

Many teachers already ask themselves these types of searching questions. It is often useful to use like-minded ringing teachers to interact with for this type of reflective practice. However, sometimes a teacher is in a situation where they are unable to collaborate with others. In this situation the like-minded group might be friends or other ringers. Discussion with like-minded people can generate insight and provide an alternative perspective on the situation. So if you do not think much about your teaching why not start discussing teaching with others, you may find it helps your teaching skills to improve.

Pip Penney

5.6. Get going with goals

Goal setting has been shown to be one of the most important motivational tools a tutor or coach can use when developing the skills of a participant in an activity.

The principles of goal setting are generic and apply across the board to many activities including ringing. Goal setting improves performance by increasing motivation.

Motivation is the key to progress

Attempting to develop ringers’ skills without a plan, involving goals can be compared to getting into a car with no steering wheel. A lot of distance may be covered but it is not possible to ensure that it is in an appropriate direction!

Goal setting can have a positive impact on your ringers by:

  • Enhancing motivation
  • Boosting confidence
  • Reducing anxiety and fear of failure
  • Promoting a positive mental attitude

Goals provide direction by providing a target to aim for, people know what they are trying to achieve.

Goals can help with persistence both when being successful and when struggling to become successful. When a goal is achieved confidence is increased, ringers feel they are doing well, they feel good about themselves. When things are not going so well, ringers will look for new strategies to help them achieve what they want. This could be by attending more practices or a course.

If there is no goal to aim for, when making progress gets tough, ringers are likely to quit.
Setting goals successfully is not easy

When setting goals for your ringers you need to think of goals for the band as a whole and goals for the individual ringers within the band. Ringers need to be involved in the goal setting process, in this way they will be committed to achieving the goals.

With early ringers moving on to Plain Hunt or their first method, the learning curve becomes steeper and more challenging for the ringer, their progress frequently slows down. At this stage it is very easy to lose ringers as they find the learning process hard and fear that they will not be able to achieve what they want to.

To reduce the likely hood of losing people at the “improver” stage there are a few basic principles which should be remembered:

  • Keep things fun and enjoyable
  • Let ringers develop at their own speed
  • Remind ringers what they have achieved so far

Keep things fun and enjoyable – the fastest way to loose people is to make things boring for them. Keep the atmosphere light-hearted and inject some humour. A Tower Captain training a new band who were at the stage of ringing rounds created a positive attitude with a couple of phrases. When the band was attempting to ring rounds rather unsuccessfully he would say “Go rounds!” The ringers were made aware that things were not as they should have been but there was no implied criticism. After a particularly poor attempt he would say “Well, it’s a jolly good thing that we are not the Red Arrows!” which brought the message home with humour.

Let ringers develop at their own natural speed. Don’t force your expectation onto people you may scare them off by expecting them to develop more quickly than they are able to. This approach will also allow time for consolidation of their skills which is important for future development.

Remind people what they have achieved so far. As their rate of progress slows down your ringers will benefit from being reminded how much they have achieved already. Remind them of how their current performance contrasts with their earlier performance

Setting goals is complicated

There are many different types of goals. Long term, short term, achievement, outcome, performance, process, controllable, realistic, challenging and considerable skill in using them effectively. But if integrated into your teaching, can deliver beneficial results for your ringers.

Pip Penney

5.7. Get GROWing with goals

Goal setting when teaching has been shown to be one of the most effective ways to motivate those learning. However, there are various factors which will make the use of goal setting work better for your ringers.

To be effective the ringer must be involved in their own goal setting
The GROW Model

The Grow Model or Process was developed in the United Kingdom in the early 1990s by Sir John Whitmore and Alan Fine and may provide a frame work to follow to help make goal setting as successful as possible.

G for goal

What does the ringer wants to work on, what is the end point he or she wants to achieve? The goal should be specific and easily defined. To attain the eventual long term goal short term goals may be needed as stepping stones.

R for reality

For the ringer to be able to achieve his or her goal the task must be realistic. New ringers frequently have unrealistic goals and imagine that they will be able to progress with ringing methods in a shorter time than is likely. Ringing teachers will need to assist the ringer to set realistic goals. The ringer needs to understand that before they have developed the requisite foundation ringing skills they will not be able to progress to method ringing. At this point Learning the Ropes Levels 2 and 3 will provide the teacher and ringer with a series of short term goals to aid progress towards the long term goal.

More advanced ringers sometimes have unrealistic goals attempting to jump from simple plain methods to advanced methods without learning to ring methods which introduce the skills and ringing experience required for more complex methods. For example, a ringer who can ring Plain Bob Major competently and aspires to ringing Surprise Major could develop skills by ringing, for example, Little Bob Major and by ringing the treble to Surprise Major methods.

O for options and obstacles

Options and obstacles to progress should be part of the discussion when goal setting. Opportunities vary from area to area and tower to tower. The ringer may have reached the level of performance at the home tower and may need to ring somewhere else to enable progression to occur.It may be that the ringer simply is not getting enough rope time to learn the method. As we know, intensive training leads to faster learning. Often one practice a week is not sufficient for those learning their first methods. For ringers who only attend intermittently the chances of progress are greatly reduced. When there were more frequent church services a ringer would have the chance to ring three times a week at their home tower, once for practice, once for morning service and once for evensong. Now a church may only have a service every few weeks and the opportunity to ring on a Sunday has reduced.

Theory of the method is important. The teacher should hold theory sessions for early ringers to ensure that the method being learned is thoroughly understood. The ringer needs to know what to do. If the ringer does not know the order of work for example, for the method they are learning, they are attempting the impossible. It is not possible to ring something if what is being attempted is not learned. This may seem rather basic but frequently learners attempt methods without actually having learned sufficient to allow them to make a successful attempt at ringing it!

The theory PowerPoint lectures provided by ART in the Teaching Toolbox provide the teacher with a comprehensive, ready made and easy to use theory sessions. They can be taken to the tower on a CD and shown to the appropriate learner before or after a practice session for example. As a teacher it is worth checking by asking the ringer the order of work or getting them to draw it out on a white board or piece of paper at each practice, until you are certain they really do know the theory of what they are attempting. Homework should be encouraged.

W for Way Forward

As the teacher you can help identify which skills need developing and how and where to get the practice required to develop the skills. That is to say to convert what is needed into a series of action steps for your ringer to take. The advice may be to ring more frequently, to attend a particular practice, to attend branch practices and outings, to read a certain book or use other teaching aids, to use the resources and quizzes on the Ringing SmART Ringer site, to learn more at home or even to attend a residential ringing course.

Each ringer needs their own “way forwards”, i.e. plan of action designed to suit their specific needs and to help them GROW and achieve what it is they have decided to attempt.

Resource Tips
  • ‘Carry on Counting’ by Karl Grave – for those learning to develop skills and Plain Hunt
  • ‘Doubles or Quit or How to Conquer Plain Bob Doubles’ by Karl Grave – for those learning to ring Plain Bob Doubles
  • ‘Plain Bob Minor a Mine of Information’ by Anthony Bishop – for those learning Plain Bob Minor
  • ‘Rounds to Ropesight’ – by Stuart Bamford, a book and DVD combo

Published by the Whiting Society and all available from the ART online shop

Pip Penney

5.8. Score from successful goals

In this article we will look at the various types of goals which can be used and when each type of goal might be useful to us when we are teaching ringers.

  • What do you think of when you set goals for your ringers?
  • Do you have a long term goal for your ringers or for your band?
  • How do you plan the actions necessary to achieve your long term goals?
Long-term goals

The long-term goal is the eventual target, in a way it is like an overall strategy. Long-term goals can be set for a band, for example becoming an 8-spliced ringing band or for an individual, for example ringing a first quarter or learning Plain Bob Doubles. It is important to have a long-term goal to aim towards, something to work towards. However, by definition long term goals take a long time to reach and this may make them seem remote and rather unachievable, a ringer may give up trying as there is no immediate success to create confidence and motivation.

Short-term goals

Short-term goals can be used as stepping stones along the way to the long term goal providing recognisable achievements along the way. Short-term goals can be specific and may be designed to work towards a certain part of the overall long term goal. These short-term goals can be used to improve any aspect of performance; handling, bell control, theory and concentration for example.

When each goal is achieved there is a boost to the ringers confidence and therefore to his or her motivation. It feels good to achieve something you have set out to complete.
Achievement Goals

Often ringers think of goals in terms of ringing a quarter peal of a certain method, perhaps a pass of the higher Levels of Learning the Ropes. This type of goal is known as an Achievement Goal. The goal is directed at achieving a target.

The problem with this sort of goal is that all the factors involved in achieving it are not controllable by the individual ringer. That is to say the achievement of the individual ringer is reliant upon the performance of others. Other ringers may go wrong or the quarter may be miscalled for example. This lack of controllability may lead to disappointment and frustration. For this reason focusing only on Achievement Goals may have unpredicted negative effects.

It is important that ringers achieve success, as without success they are likely to lose confidence in their own abilities.

There are other types of goals which are more controllable and can be used along the way to enhance confidence and motivation along the way to the eventual achievement goal.

Performance Goals

Performance Goals focus on improving performance (ringing with rhythm, improving striking, attending more frequently) that is to say on achieving a set of standards. Performance goals encourage the development of mastery of the skill, that is improving the standard of the ringing and can make a ringer feel satisfied with a performance.

These targets can be worked on by the ringer independently and are not reliant on the performance of other ringers. These goals relate to factors within the control of the ringer. Examples include:

  • Improve rhythm on six – by ringing lots of Plain Hunt from different bells
  • Improve 3/4 up dodge in Plain Bob Doubles – by ringing Bayles Bob Doubles
  • Improve ringing up and down in peal – by practising on 3 then 4 then 6 then 8 bells
  • Improve striking in Doubles Methods – by learning and ringing four new Doubles methods
  • Improve treble ringing to Cambridge Surprise Minor – by ringing Treble Bob Hunt as an exercise
Process goals

Process Goals focus on controllable factors that will result in improvement, they can be used to concentrate on or to emphasise areas where a ringer needs to work to improve technique. For example: bell control, handling style, handling skills – such as pulling right through or catching the tail end after the handstroke pull, or listening skills, using a simulator or learning theory

  • Improve dodging striking at backstroke – by practising taking in and letting out rope
  • Improve accuracy of moving bell at handstroke and backstroke – kaleidoscope sequences
  • Improve ability to set bell – bell control exercises such as "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star"
  • Reduce method mistakes – learn theory more thoroughly, using quizzes, questioning, write out on board

Remember as a teacher to give feedback!

Research has demonstrated that by focusing on performance goals and process goals which are controllable rather than just on achievement goals, individuals are more likely to become more confident and better able to concentrate.

It is our responsibility as teachers to help set goals which can be realistically achieved.

Pip Penney

6. Education matters

National Teachers' Standards and Learning the Ropes

Clare learned to ring under those old ways of teaching, and now considers the ART approach – and the Learning the Ropes scheme in particular – against the Teachers’ Standards used in the world of school education.

Responding to the psychological needs of learners

Using Self Determination Theory, Mark looks at the teaching of bell ringing, to understand what motivates people to learn and why the sense of fulfilment or personal flourishing is so important in that process.

An exploration of learning styles

Jenny looks at the VAK learning styles model; its validity and its limitations. See how students learn using a mixture of learning styles and how their preferences may well change as learning progresses.

6.1. National Teachers' Standards and Learning the Ropes

The ART approach was developed when, according to its website, ‘National ringing institutions recognised that the aging population of Tower Captains meant that the old ways of teaching had to change’. Dr Clare Lawrence learnt to ring under those old ways of teaching, and now considers the ART approach – and the Learning the Ropes scheme in particular – against the Teachers’ Standards used in the world of school education.

As we all know, teaching has changed. In Initial Teacher Education, we stand or fall by the National Teachers’ Standards, introduced in 2012 to give a ‘clear baseline of expectations for the professional practice … of teachers’. Every observation, appraisal or self-reflection for the trainee teacher is aligned with this set of guidelines and requirements.

I only discovered recently that the teaching of bellringing has also moved on. I found the ART website fascinating, and also deeply encouraging. Bellringing, it seems, is alive and kicking, and being brought to the next generation in an exciting, innovative, considered and forward-looking way.

So what happens if you put both together? How does the Learning the Ropes (LtR) scheme fare if evaluated using elements of the Teachers’ Standards? The answer, it seems, is that in general it seems to fare rather well.

Standard 1: Set high expectations and ensure a safe learning environment

The Learning the Ropes (LtR) scheme certainly emphasises tower safety from the outset. Before anything else, the new ringer learns to handle a bell properly and safely, and to respect tower rules.

Standard 2: Promote good progress

The LtR scheme has done a great deal to de-mystify progress in ringing.In the old days, you learned to handle a bell, then it was very much a case of ‘just do more, and do it better’. There was also very little sense of personal autonomy. The new ringer took whichever bell he or she was directed to take, and rang whatever the captain directed. The LtR scheme gives learners the opportunity to understand and reflect on where they are in their ringing journey, and through this to take responsibility for their own progress.

Standard 3: Demonstrate good knowledge of the subject

Clearly, a ringing teacher needs competency in ringing; this is a skills-based activity and the teacher needs to have mastery of those skills before they can be passed on. How to pass them on is a whole other matter. Bellringing is, I would suggest, not something that can be advanced through discussion or exploration. You can’t ‘try out’ a new way to handle a bell, nor ‘see how it goes’ in Stedman. This means that many of the more socially-constructed pedagogies (teaching methods) are unsuitable, and it may therefore be a challenge to foster and maintain the interest of younger ringers used to a more negotiated learning style at school. Conversely, though, for other people it is the very exact and concrete nature of bell-ringing which draws them to it, and many may relish the precision of the teaching required.

Standard 4: Provide well-structured sessions

Equally, ringing is not a skill you can master on your own. You can’t take a bell home to practice basic bell-handling, and although there are all sorts of ways of getting methods fixed in your head, at the end of the day you need a team of ringers to try that method out for real. With this in mind, one of the skills of the tower captain is to clarify the structure of practice nights. When will time be put aside to encourage new ringers, when are experienced ringers needed in support and when can those same ringers be let free to try their hand at their own challenges.M any a case of umbrage can be avoided if that expected round of Reverse Canterbury Doubles really does take place as promised at the end of the practice.

Standard 5: Adapt to respond to different strengths and needs

Meeting diverse needs remains an important challenge in all teaching, but the LtR scheme is at its core learner-centred, enabling progress to be measured against that learners’ previous position and allowing for individualised learning.

Standard 6: Make accurate and productive use of assessment

I remember, when I learnt, there was very little talk in the tower. You rang, you swapped bells or stood out, you rang again. The only real feedback came in competitions, when your bell might be singled out for praise or admonition. The LtR scheme makes the criteria for success at each level so much more transparent so that new ringers know what they are being assessed on, and how to do well.

Standard 7: Manage behaviour effectively

A bell tower is no place for ill-disciplined behaviour, and the LtR teacher and mentor training supports effective management of clear rules and expectations. Furthermore, the ART guidelines, policies and codes of practice brings safeguarding and the responsibilities of working with young people and vulnerable adults firmly into the 21st century.

Standard 8: Fulfil wider professional responsibilities

I don’t know if the ART approach has reconciled the old adversaries – ringers, vicar, organist, verger and churchwardens – and the timing of when the bells stop before the service and when the organist begins his or her prelude may still be disputed in many parishes. However, there is every evidence that the ART approach is bringing ringing up to date, valuing the teaching of ringing as a serious concern and supporting bell ringing to thrive on into another generation. So, who knows – may be one day even the wider public, may be brought on board. Perhaps one day they will learn to say, not that the bells are ringing, but that people are ringing the bells – and that they are ringing them well!

Dr Clare Lawrence
Clare has been a bellringer or organist (and very occasionally both) at various churches over the last 40 years.
She is Senior Lecturer in Teacher Development at Bishop Grosseteste University in Lincoln.

6.2. Responding to the psychological needs of learners

The teaching of bellringing, like any other form of teaching, requires sensitivity and acute awareness of the needs of those who are going through the learning process. In recent years a great deal of work has been carried out to try to understand what motivates people to learn and why the sense of fulfilment or personal flourishing is so important in that process. An understanding of some of this theory can help us as teachers, to ensure that those in our care are better understood, and help us to see things from the learner’s perspective as well as from our own.

One such theory of motivation is Self Determination Theory (SDT), developed by American psychologists Edward Deci and Richard Ryan. This postulates that personal growth is linked to the fulfilment or satisfaction of specific and innate psychological needs, namely autonomyrelatedness, and competence. The theory argues that these three needs provide the foundation blocks for development or hindrance of motivation and general personal wellbeing. If these needs are fulfilled, then this results in positive learning and personal growth, and if not, then the individual will become demotivated and frustrated. In the bell tower context, if these needs are fulfilled, then the ringer will feel engaged and energised to learn, and if not, they will become agitated or disengaged.

Self Determination Theory has been applied in a number of contexts, including group leadership, health contexts, individual performance at work, and research studies have confirmed the importance of all three psychological components. Let us now take each of these in turn, and apply them to the bell tower context. No doubt, as practising ringing teachers, you will be more able to see the connections than I can.

Autonomy

The first component of SDT is autonomy. This refers to perceiving oneself as being the origin and source of ones’ behaviour, rather than simply as an automaton on behalf of someone else, as feeling in charge of ourselves and our actions. It is not the same as independence, where we don’t need to rely on someone else for help. Indeed, we may be very reliant on other people, both for guidance and for ongoing support in learning any new skill. But ultimately autonomy means that we are doing what we want to do. There is no sense in which we feel coerced or threatened into activity which we would actually rather not be a part of. Ringing teachers need to be aware of this as they lead and guide new-comers: yes, there are rules and structures that all ringers are required to adhere to, but:

The learner must be helped to feel that they are in charge of their own learning process, and ultimately, they will only rise to excellence when they commit to that learning process.
Relatedness

The second component of SDT is relatedness. Ryan and Deci describe this as, “feeling connected to others, to caring for and being cared for by those others, to having a sense of belongingness both with others and with one’s community” (Ryan and Deci, 2004. P7). It means feeling safe, secure and comfortable in the context and with the other people who are there. I guess that we all recognise this from our own experience: when we don’t feel known and accepted, we become self-conscious, and all of our energies are swallowed up in trying to fit in, or trying to gauge the thoughts and actions of everyone around us so that we know how to respond. In other words, the energy that should be going into learning to ring is instead dissipated into other concerns. Talking with each other about our thoughts and feelings is important here: are we feeling comfortable, is this enjoyable, do we feel as if we’re getting the hang of it? We British can sometimes be a little reluctant to share and probe each other at this level, but appropriate conversations are necessary in order for us to feel that we are being seen, understood and included.

On the other hand, this needs to be done with tact and sensitivity. Few newcomers want to feel that they are being scrutinised and made the centre and focus of attention. They want to know as much about others in the group as well. They will be looking for a two-way connection of minds and hearts, a real sense of becoming and being a part of the group. Unfortunately, we are all different in this respect: some of us feel the need to pour out our souls at the first opportunity; others of us are much more reserved, and prefer to watch and listen first, only sharing ourselves when we feel ready.

The key thing is to be sensitive to the newcomer, to be proactive as hosts, but taking our cue from them, and aware at all times of their needs as well as their insecurities.
Competence

The third component of SDT is competence. By this is meant a felt sense of confidence and effectiveness in the task at hand. Note that it is a felt sense, rather than an actual, objective mastery that is being referred to here. An individual does not need to be a world class ringer to feel competent, but they must feel that they are making progress or performing at a level that they are proud of. A greater sense of competence will lead to greater sense of confidence, self-respect and personal growth.Some people will be entirely self-determined in this respect: they don’t care what anybody else thinks, and they are only interested in whether they think what they have done is good. But they are the exceptions! Most of us will be looking out for cues from others: How am I doing? Is this right? In other words, our sense of competence will be strengthened or diminished by the looks and comments of others. As teachers then, we must give affirmation where it is due, as well as corrective guidance which will help to provide clear and honest feedback on actions which are not quite as should be expected. But most importantly, we should be sensitive to the learner’s inner psychological state.

The questions we should be asking are: What encouragement or clarification does this person need from me? How can I be helping this person to feel positive about the progress that they are making?
The components are linked

The other thing that SDT theory states is that each of these psychological components is intimately linked with the others. If we don’t feel in control (autonomous), it will affect our sense of belonging (relatedness) and our sense of competence. If we don’t feel competent, it will affect our feelings about autonomy and connectedness, and so on. In other words, ringing teachers need to be on the ball on all of these fronts. It is not sufficient just to focus on the learner’s sense of competence, ignoring how they are fitting in to the group or how they feel about the learning process itself. We must be aware that the learner is a complex social individual with a range of needs that have been shaped by circumstances well beyond our and their control. If we really want to help them to learn the ‘ropes’, then we need to acknowledge that, and to make provision for each of these elements.

Summary

In summary then, Self Determination Theory states that good progress and contentment in any context is dependent on three inner states of being: feeling autonomous, feeling related and feeling competent. This is hardly rocket science. But that is precisely the beauty of the theory. It is so simple that we can easily apply it to everyday life and practice. And there is a growing collection of evidence to show that indeed, each element of the theory is inter-related and convincingly significant.

So, as ringing teachers, what can we do to ensure that our ringers feel in control of their learning, fully connected to the group, and growing in competence and mastery on the ropes? How can we make sure that learners feel comfortable on all of these fronts, so that they are looking forward to coming back next week? Self determination theory provides some useful pointers for exploring these questions, and a helpful structure for enabling us to evaluate the ongoing quality of our provision for newcomers to the tower.

Mark Plater

6.3. An exploration of learning styles

Research on learning styles can be traced back over a hundred years and generally it set outs to explore how individuals approach and deal with learning situations. Many learning style models have been developed over this time and some are sufficiently well documented, tested and influential to be taken seriously, for example Kolb’s ‘Learning Style Inventory’ (Kolb, 1999). However, as you delve in to the research of each learning style model that has been proposed, reliability and validity can be questioned and findings are frequently contradictory and inconclusive.

The most simple of these learning style models, and therefore possibly the most widely used (and subsequently misused) is that of VAK (visual, auditory and kinaesthetic). It has been strongly argued that VAK lacks both reliability and validity and does not have a solid basis in research (Sharpe et al., 2008). VAK learning style questionnaires offer no sound diagnostic or predictive pedagogical power and can be completely misleading.

“It is sometimes claimed that learning styles are largely fixed and innate. This belief can lead teachers to label students as having a particular learning style and so provide materials and sources that are appropriate to that style. Students may then come to internalise this label and think of themselves as a certain learner who should concentrate on this diagnosed style.” (Demos, 2004). Indeed, I have met many learners who label themselves as ‘kinaesthetic’ and believe that they will only be able to learn if the teaching is ‘hands-on’. The Demos ‘About Learning’ report goes on to say “Whilst it may be true that some learners have a dominant learning style, a good education does not limit them to that style or type, but ensures that students have opportunities to strengthen the other learning styles. In misguided hands, learning styles could become not a means of personalising learning, but a new version of general intelligence that slots learners into preconceived categories and puts unwarranted ceilings on their intellectual development and achievement.”

What can be concluded from the array of learning style models is that learning is complicated and multi-dimensional. Research in to this area must continue but as teachers we have to concede to the fact that teaching is complex and requires effort. We should never be content with simple, ‘quick-fix’ models.

What does all this mean for a ringing teacher? Good teachers know that student’s learn through all of their senses and that the brain processes information from all that it sees, hears and does. As Pip Penney states in her book, ‘Teacher’s Guide to Learning the Ropes’; “It is important to use demonstration, explanation and exercises which allow the ringer to learn by experience.” Acknowledging some of the complexities that the research shows, the book rightly goes on to state that students learn using a mixture of ‘learning styles’ and preferences may change as learning progresses. Consider using a range of models, diagrams, pictures, demonstrations, verbal explanations, analogies, reviewing video footage, as well as exploring the senses, for example, focussing on what is heard and felt. But most importantly, consult with your students and ask them to reflect on their own progress. How do they feel they have learnt that particular skill best? You may well find it is different for every skill and every learner!

To summarise, a teacher needs to provide a range of approaches for their learners and adapt to their needs, being willing to try several different approaches until the learner makes the desired progress. This will also have the side-effect of making the learning more enjoyable to all.
Dr Jenny A Wynn
Senior Lecturer in Teacher Development
Programme Leader for PGCE Secondary
Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy

Bishop Grosseteste University


References

Demos (2004). About Learning: Report of the Learning Working Group. London: Demos.

Kolb, D. (1999). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Boston: Hay Group.

Penney, P. (Ed. Belcher, L.) (2017). Teacher’s Guide to Learning the Ropes. Association of Ringing Teachers.

Sharp, J., Bowker, R. & Byrne, J. (2008). VAK or VAK-uous? Towards the trivialisation of learning and the death of scholarship. Research Papers in Education 23:3 293-314.